header-logo header-logo

26 June 2008 / Paola Fudakowska , Paul Hewitt
Issue: 7327 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate , Mental health
printer mail-detail

Wills & probate update

MENTAL CAPACITY ACT
UNDUE INFLUENCE

CAPACITY TO MAKE A WILL POST-MENTAL CAPACITY ACT 2005

Scammell v Farmer [2008] EWHC 1100 (Ch), [2008] All ER (D) 296 (May)

The claimants (C) are the two grandchildren of Irene Scammell who died on 3 July 2003. They challenged the validity of her last will made in early 2003 on the basis of lack of capacity, lack of knowledge and approval, and undue influence. Mrs Scammell’s daughter, the defendant (D), was the sole beneficiary of the will to the exclusion of C. Mrs Scammell had executed an earlier will leaving her property to C in equal shares and the remainder of her estate to be divided between D and a third party.

The earlier will, and all copies of it, had been destroyed by D after Mrs Scammell’s death. As a result Mr Stephen Smith QC, sitting as a deputy judge of the Chancery Division, approached D’s evidence with caution.

Despite a diagnosis of early onset Alzheimer’s in September 2001, the judge held that

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Sara Mason

Bellevue Law—Sara Mason

Bellevue Law expands workplace law offering with specialist healthcare regulatory appointment

Seddons GSC—Peter Ames

Seddons GSC—Peter Ames

Seddons GSC strengthens Dispute Resolution team with partner hire

Taylor Rose—four promotions

Taylor Rose—four promotions

Taylor Rose announces partner promotions

NEWS
Group claims, disputed costs and judicial recruitment dominate the latest courtroom round-up
Landlords face fresh registration duties as procedural reforms reshape the civil courts
Sanctions can derail commercial disputes long before judgment, making early planning essential
Pressure is mounting for a dedicated UK AI law, but deciding what it should achieve remains the central challenge
Legal professional privilege has checked the SRA’s investigative powers, exposing difficult questions about tackling suspected abusive litigation
back-to-top-scroll