header-logo header-logo

Wills & probate update

26 June 2008 / Paola Fudakowska , Paul Hewitt
Issue: 7327 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate , Mental health
printer mail-detail

MENTAL CAPACITY ACT
UNDUE INFLUENCE

CAPACITY TO MAKE A WILL POST-MENTAL CAPACITY ACT 2005

Scammell v Farmer [2008] EWHC 1100 (Ch), [2008] All ER (D) 296 (May)

The claimants (C) are the two grandchildren of Irene Scammell who died on 3 July 2003. They challenged the validity of her last will made in early 2003 on the basis of lack of capacity, lack of knowledge and approval, and undue influence. Mrs Scammell’s daughter, the defendant (D), was the sole beneficiary of the will to the exclusion of C. Mrs Scammell had executed an earlier will leaving her property to C in equal shares and the remainder of her estate to be divided between D and a third party.

The earlier will, and all copies of it, had been destroyed by D after Mrs Scammell’s death. As a result Mr Stephen Smith QC, sitting as a deputy judge of the Chancery Division, approached D’s evidence with caution.

Despite a diagnosis of early onset Alzheimer’s in September 2001, the judge held that

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll