header-logo header-logo

26 June 2008 / Paola Fudakowska , Paul Hewitt
Issue: 7327 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate , Mental health
printer mail-detail

Wills & probate update

MENTAL CAPACITY ACT
UNDUE INFLUENCE

CAPACITY TO MAKE A WILL POST-MENTAL CAPACITY ACT 2005

Scammell v Farmer [2008] EWHC 1100 (Ch), [2008] All ER (D) 296 (May)

The claimants (C) are the two grandchildren of Irene Scammell who died on 3 July 2003. They challenged the validity of her last will made in early 2003 on the basis of lack of capacity, lack of knowledge and approval, and undue influence. Mrs Scammell’s daughter, the defendant (D), was the sole beneficiary of the will to the exclusion of C. Mrs Scammell had executed an earlier will leaving her property to C in equal shares and the remainder of her estate to be divided between D and a third party.

The earlier will, and all copies of it, had been destroyed by D after Mrs Scammell’s death. As a result Mr Stephen Smith QC, sitting as a deputy judge of the Chancery Division, approached D’s evidence with caution.

Despite a diagnosis of early onset Alzheimer’s in September 2001, the judge held that

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde Co strengthens energy transition and construction offering with hire of Suriya Ashok

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

NEWS
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
Arbitration may be private, but its confidentiality is no impenetrable shield. Writing in NLJ this week, James Glaysher of Kingsley Napley examines when courts will permit arbitral material to surface in open litigation
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

back-to-top-scroll