header-logo header-logo

17 November 2017 / Henrietta Mason , Paola Fudakowska
Issue: 7770 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

Wills & probate update

nlj_7770_fudakowska

Paola Fudakowska & Henrietta Mason return with an update on family rifts, mistakes & undue influence

  • Undue influence always has to be proved; it is never presumed.
  • Whether an award could be reversed 10 years after death

In Ball v Ball [2017] EWHC 1750 (Ch), [2017] All ER (D) 31 (Aug) Barbara Olive Ball (Mrs Ball) made her last will on 27 May 1992. She died some years later on 8 November 2013.

Mrs Ball had 11 children with her husband, James Sayles Ball, who predeceased her. There was a rift in the family dating back to 1991, when three of the children, Barbara, Debra and Nigel, the claimants to this action (the claimants), reported their father to the police for sexually abusing them when they were younger. Mr Ball was prosecuted and pleaded guilty to sexual abuse of the second claimant and to incest and indecent assault on the third claimant. There was apparently a suspended prison sentence.

Mrs Ball’s will excluded the claimants from benefit, dividing her estate between the remaining

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll