header-logo header-logo

20 March 2020
Categories: Legal News , Immigration & asylum , Discrimination
printer mail-detail

Windrush inquiry concludes scandal was ‘foreseeable’

Home Office failings that led to the Windrush scandal were ‘consistent with some elements of the definition of institutional racism’, an independent inquiry has found

The ‘Windrush Lessons Learned Review', authored by Wendy Williams, an inspector of constabulary, was published this week. The 275-page report concluded that what happened was ‘foreseeable and avoidable’.

Williams found the causes of the scandal could be ‘traced back through successive rounds of policy and legislation about immigration and nationality from the 1960s onwards, the aim of which was to restrict the eligibility of certain groups to live in the UK’. While the Immigration Act 1971 confirmed that the Windrush generation has the right of abode in the UK, ‘they were not given any documents to demonstrate this status. Nor were records kept’. Successive governments sought to act tough on immigration, ‘passing laws creating, then expanding the hostile environment, this was done with a complete disregard for the Windrush generation’.  

Williams said Home Office officials and ministers ignored warning signs, even after news of the scandal broke in the media in 2017. Various ‘organisational factors’ created the environment for mistakes, ‘including a culture of disbelief and carelessness when dealing with applications’. She makes 30 recommendations for change, including that the Home Office ‘acknowledge the wrong which has been done… open itself up to greater external scrutiny; and… change its culture to recognise that migration and wider Home Office policy is about people and, whatever its objective, should be rooted in humanity’.

The Home Office wrongly designated thousands of legal UK residents, many of whom moved to the UK with their parents during the 1950s and 1960s, as being in the country illegally. Some were wrongly deported, while others lost their jobs, were denied benefits, made homeless, prevented from travelling and refused NHS care.

Former Home Secretary Amber Rudd resigned over the scandal in April 2018.

The Windrush generation is defined as those who came to Britain between 1948 and 1973, on the invitation of the British government to help the country rebuild after the Second World War. The Empire Windrush docked with the first immigrants from the Caribbean.

Marcia Longdon, immigration partner at Kingsley Napley, said: ‘Windrush was the biggest catastrophe in UK immigration history and it is important to learn the lessons from this debacle.

‘To ensure we don’t repeat this mistake, it is imperative the government act on the report’s recommendations, particularly now many EU citizens are awaiting an outcome from the Home Office with regards to their right to remain under the EU settlement scheme.

‘An apology from the Home Secretary, Priti Patel, does little to right the wrongs of the Home Office. The compensation scheme set up last year has been slow to reach victims, many of whom are still struggling to rebuild their lives. I urge the Home Secretary to review the current laws that continue to create the hostile environment, as a matter of priority.’

Giving an official apology in the House of Commons this week, Home Secretary Priti Patel said: ‘On behalf of this and successive governments I am truly sorry.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Projects and rail practices strengthened by director hire in London

DWF—Stephen Hickling

DWF—Stephen Hickling

Real estate team in Birmingham welcomes back returning partner

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Firm invests in national growth with 44 appointments across five offices

NEWS
The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 transformed criminal justice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ed Cape of UWE and Matthew Hardcastle and Sandra Paul of Kingsley Napley trace its ‘seismic impact’
Operational resilience is no longer optional. Writing in NLJ this week, Emma Radmore and Michael Lewis of Womble Bond Dickinson explain how UK regulators expect firms to identify ‘important business services’ that could cause ‘intolerable levels of harm’ if disrupted
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
As the drip-feed of Epstein disclosures fuels ‘collateral damage’, the rush to cry misconduct in public office may be premature. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke of Hill Dickinson warns that the offence is no catch-all for political embarrassment. It demands a ‘grave departure’ from proper standards, an ‘abuse of the public’s trust’ and conduct ‘sufficiently serious to warrant criminal punishment’
back-to-top-scroll