header-logo header-logo

Wireless Festival site was lawful

20 November 2017
Issue: 7771 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

A London council acted lawfully in hiring out part of Finsbury Park for the 2016 Wireless Festival, the Court of Appeal has held.

Thousands of music fans headed to the north London park in July last year for the three-day festival, headlined by Calvin Harris, Chase & Status and Kygo. However, the event also caused disruption for local dog-walkers and other users of the park.

In R (oao Friends of Finsbury Park) v Haringey LBC [2017] EWCA Civ 1831, the court rejected the argument put forward by the group, Friends of Finsbury Park, that the council did not have the authority to restrict access to any part of the park for the purposes of recreation. The Friends argued that facilitating a major event, to the exclusion of the public generally, was a breach of the council’s duty to hold the park in trust for public recreation.

The court held that s 145 of the Local Government Act 1972, in conferring a power on all local authorities to ‘enclose or set apart any part of a park’ for the provision of entertainment, gave the council authority to exclude the public so the festival could go ahead.

Delivering the lead judgment, Lord Justice Hickinbottom said ‘there does not appear to be a logical reason why London boroughs should be deprived of the powers which non-London local authorities have in respect of entertainment in parks under s 145.

‘[Counsel for the appellant, Richard Harwood QC] suggested that there might be a rationale in the population density in London and/or the size of the capital, but there is nothing to suggest that Parliament had that in mind as a reason to reduce the powers in London’.

Hugh Craddock, a Friends’ case officer, said the decision was ‘hugely disappointing… Some councils have acted as if their parks were their own private land, and rented them out to maximise revenue’.

Issue: 7771 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll