header-logo header-logo

17 August 2022
Categories: Legal News , Profession , Diversity
printer mail-detail

Working class professionals held back

Talented people from lower socio-economic backgrounds continue to face major obstacles to career progression at senior levels in the UK financial and professional services, research shows

The City of London Socio-Economic Diversity Taskforce published a major report on the issue last week, the first report of its kind to focus on socio-economic diversity.

It found 64% of senior leaders surveyed were from a family with a professional background―nearly double the proportion (37%) of the UK population.

Among senior employees, 26% attended fee-paying schools, which is three times the national average of 7.5%, while 20% of junior-level and 16% of mid-level respondents attended fee-paying schools.

Of those respondents from a working-class background, 37% felt their background had held them back at work, compared to 18% from a professional background. Employees from working class backgrounds felt less able to be themselves at work, were more likely to feel like an outsider, more likely to feel that their background negatively impacted their career and more likely to feel that they did not have the same chances of success in the workplace.

Just 1% of respondents in senior positions were ethnic minority women from working-class backgrounds.

In the legal sector, statistics from Solicitors Regulation Authority show 58% of lawyers working in law firms are from a professional background (compared to 37% nationally) and 23% of lawyers attended a fee-paying school.

I Stephanie Boyce, president of the Law Society, which sits on the City of London Socio-Economic Diversity Taskforce, said: ‘The report draws urgent attention to the need for professional services―including the legal sector―to improve their socio-economic diversity to ensure we reflect the society we serve.

‘Working class people―who were under-represented across organisations and at senior levels―reported feeling less included in the workplace. As a child brought up in a single-parent household on a council estate I can understand why people from similar backgrounds may feel left out in the workplace.

‘Not having the connections others may have had made it more difficult for me to break into and progress in the legal sector. We need to act now to ensure there is socio-economic diversity at all levels. Doing nothing is not an option.’

Boyce said the Law Society is launching a ‘Social Mobility Web Hub’, which will provide practical and expert resources to help organisations promote socio-economic diversity.

The Taskforce is due to publish its recommendations later this year. Find out more about the Taskforce here.

Categories: Legal News , Profession , Diversity
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Trowers & Hamlins—Paul Batchelor

Trowers & Hamlins—Paul Batchelor

Trowers Hamlins strengthens Birmingham Office with senior corporate partner hire

Birketts—trainee appointments

Birketts—trainee appointments

Birketts welcomes largest ever Trainee Solicitor cohort for 2026

Sidley—James Sherlock

Sidley—James Sherlock

Sidley Expands Private Equity Practice With James Sherlock in London

NEWS
MPs cannot simply resign their Commons seats. Instead, they take a nominal Crown office, usually the Chiltern Hundreds or Manor of Northstead, which disqualifies them from sitting
Developers in areas with poorly performing councils can apply directly to the Planning Inspectorate for permission under section 62A of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990
The Thirlwall Inquiry has exposed a ‘complete failure’ to protect babies at the Countess of Chester Hospital, but its recommendations must now be put into practice
A divorced woman has secured funding to participate in her former husband’s inquest after the Legal Aid Agency reconsidered repeated refusals
When does a solicitor’s retainer become a contentious business agreement? The Court of Appeal’s decision in Broadfield Law UK LLP v Barnes shows that listing hourly rates alone will not do, leaving firms and clients uncertain about their rights over bills
back-to-top-scroll