header-logo header-logo

Working in the EU: the same but different?

23 May 2019 / Charles Pigott
Issue: 7841 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail
A claim arising in the French office of an international law firm should stay in France, as Charles Pigott explains

In Ravisy v Simmons & Simmons LLP and Taylor UKEAT/0085/18 the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) has endorsed an employment tribunal’s ruling that it had no jurisdiction to hear various claims under Equality Act 2010 brought by a Paris-based partner in an international legal practice.

The dispute over forced retirement

Like many UK-based international law firms Simmons & Simmons is a limited liability partnership registered in England and Wales with members (still normally referred to as ‘partners’) working both in the UK and in a number of international offices, including Paris. The employment judge found that the Paris office was not a wholly independent business but enjoyed ‘the mixture of delegated autonomy and integrated control’ that would be expected for a ‘substantial national office’ of an international law business.

The claimant was a dual Madagascan and French national who had lived in France since the early 80s. She became

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll