header-logo header-logo

Working in the EU: the same but different?

23 May 2019 / Charles Pigott
Issue: 7841 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail
A claim arising in the French office of an international law firm should stay in France, as Charles Pigott explains

In Ravisy v Simmons & Simmons LLP and Taylor UKEAT/0085/18 the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) has endorsed an employment tribunal’s ruling that it had no jurisdiction to hear various claims under Equality Act 2010 brought by a Paris-based partner in an international legal practice.

The dispute over forced retirement

Like many UK-based international law firms Simmons & Simmons is a limited liability partnership registered in England and Wales with members (still normally referred to as ‘partners’) working both in the UK and in a number of international offices, including Paris. The employment judge found that the Paris office was not a wholly independent business but enjoyed ‘the mixture of delegated autonomy and integrated control’ that would be expected for a ‘substantial national office’ of an international law business.

The claimant was a dual Madagascan and French national who had lived in France since the early 80s. She became

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

FOIL—Bridget Tatham

FOIL—Bridget Tatham

Forum of Insurance Lawyers elects president for 2026

Gibson Dunn—Robbie Sinclair

Gibson Dunn—Robbie Sinclair

Partner joinslabour and employment practice in London

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

NEWS
Cryptocurrency is reshaping financial remedy cases, warns Robert Webster of Maguire Family Law in NLJ this week. Digital assets—concealable, volatile and hard to trace—are fuelling suspicions of hidden wealth, yet Form E still lacks a section for crypto-disclosure
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold surveys a flurry of procedural reforms in his latest 'Civil way' column
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
back-to-top-scroll