header-logo header-logo

THIS ISSUE
Card image

Issue: Vol 164, Issue 7633

05 December 2014
IN THIS ISSUE

Cotton v Earl of Cardigan and others [2014] EWCA Civ 1312, [2014] All ER (D) 232 (Oct)

Loring and others v The Woodland Trust [2014] EWCA Civ 1314, [2014] All ER (D) 198 (Oct)

In the first in a series of articles, Elizabeth Metliss considers the judicial view of aggressive correspondence

The Bond Solon Annual Expert Witness Survey highlights the stresses that witnesses are facing, says Mark Solon

Why do PI lawyers make such awful ads, asks Jon Robins

MPs reject Lords’ amendment of judicial review reforms

Top judges express concern over increase of litigants in person

Show
10
Results
Results
10
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll