header-logo header-logo

THIS ISSUE
Card image

Issue: Vol 165, Issue 7644

13 March 2015
IN THIS ISSUE

Roger Smith follows some figures of speech

Kate Molan & Lucy Cummin warn against increasing transparency in the family courts

Stephen Boyd tells a cautionary tale

Nicholas Griffin QC considers the future of the Goddard Inquiry into child sexual abuse

AFD Software Ltd v ZIP Address Ltd [2015] EWHC 453 (Ch), [2015] All ER (D) 30 (Mar)

Stevens v Equity Syndicate Management Ltd [2015] EWCA Civ 93, [2015] All ER (D) 301 (Feb)

FSA Srl v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) T-558/13, [2015] All ER (D) 40 (Mar)

R (on the application of Catt) v Metropolitan Police Commissioner; R (on the application of T) v Metropolitan Police Commissioner [2015] UKSC 9, [2015] All ER (D) 31 (Mar)

Carlos Soto SAU and another v AP Møller-Maersk AS [2015] All ER (D) 28 (Mar), [2015] EWHC 458 (Comm)

R (on the application of Ben Hoare Bell Solicitors and others) v Lord Chancellor [2015] EWHC 523 (Admin), [2015] All ER (D) 19 (Mar)

Show
10
Results
Results
10
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde Co strengthens energy transition and construction offering with hire of Suriya Ashok

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

NEWS
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
Arbitration may be private, but its confidentiality is no impenetrable shield. Writing in NLJ this week, James Glaysher of Kingsley Napley examines when courts will permit arbitral material to surface in open litigation
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

back-to-top-scroll