Re Lehman Brothers International (Europe) (in administration); subnom Joint Administrators of LB Holdings Intermediate 2 Ltd (in administration) and others v Lomas and others [2015] EWCA Civ 485, [2015] All ER (D) 139 (May)
Brown v London Borough of Haringey [2015] EWCA Civ 483, [2015] All ER (D) 126 (May)
Dransfield v Information Commission and another; Craven v Information Commissioner and another [2015] EWCA Civ 454, [2015] All ER (D) 132 (May)
Members of the armed forces should have recourse to the courts, argues Richard Scorer
Haile v Waltham Forest London Borough [2015] UKSC 34, [2015] All ER (D) 173 (May)
Rhodes v OPO (by his litigation friend) and another [2015] UKSC 32, [2015] All ER (D) 177 (May)
Does lack of clarity in the legal aid scheme prevent access to justice, asks David Burrows
How has Lawrence v Fen Tigers Ltd been treated at first instance, asks Andrew Francis
Société Coopérative de Production SeaFrance S.A. v Competition and Markets Authority and another [2015] EWCA Civ 487, [2015] All ER (D) 146 (May)
MOVERS & SHAKERS
NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires
Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on
Ellisons—Sarah Osborne
Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team
DWF—Chris Air
Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment
An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ
