header-logo header-logo

THIS ISSUE
Card image

Issue: Vol 166, Issue 7725

02 December 2016
IN THIS ISSUE

Will the English courts still be top choice post-Brexit, asks Jonathan Harris QC

Rahim v Arch Insurance Co. (Europe) Ltd [2016] EWHC 2967 (Comm), [2016] All ER (D) 142 (Nov)

Peter Vaines reports on the latest news from the world of tax

Avonwick Holdings Ltd and another v Shlosberg [2016] EWCA Civ 1138, [2016] All ER (D) 141 (Nov)

Co-operation versus litigation: could mediation be the new & improved face of justice, asks Glenn Stanbury

Will the Hague Convention be to court litigation what the New York Convention has been to arbitration, asks Jan-Jaap Baer

Defamatory guts; blame the accountant; & wretched costs

Show
10
Results
Results
10
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gilson Gray—Paul Madden

Gilson Gray—Paul Madden

Partner appointed to head international insolvency and dispute resolution for England

Brachers—Gill Turner Tucker

Brachers—Gill Turner Tucker

Kent firm expands regional footprint through strategic acquisition

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—William Charles

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—William Charles

Financial disputes and investigations specialist joins as partner in London

NEWS
Ministers’ proposals to raise funds by seizing interest on lawyers’ client account schemes could ‘cause firms to close’, solicitors have warned
Pension sharing orders (PSOs) have quietly reached their 25th anniversary, yet remain stubbornly underused. Writing in NLJ this week, Joanna Newton of Stowe Family Law argues that this neglect risks long-term financial harm, particularly for women
A school ski trip, a confiscated phone and an unauthorised hotel-room entry culminated in a pupil’s permanent exclusion. In this week's issue of NLJ, Nicholas Dobson charts how the Court of Appeal upheld the decision despite acknowledged procedural flaws
Is a suspect’s state of mind a ‘fact’ capable of triggering adverse inferences? Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Smith of Corker Binning examines how R v Leslie reshapes the debate
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
back-to-top-scroll