header-logo header-logo

THIS ISSUE
Card image

Issue: Vol 167, Issue 7741

07 April 2017
IN THIS ISSUE

Dr Tony Harvey examines the new draft money-laundering regulations

Turley v London Borough of Wandsworth and another [2017] EWCA Civ 189, [2017] All ER (D) 180 (Mar)

Taylor v Van Dutch Marine Holding Ltd and others [2017] EWHC 636 (Ch), [2017] All ER (D) 175 (Mar)

Darnley v Croydon Health Services NHS Trust [2017] EWCA Civ 151, [2017] All ER (D) 191 (Mar)

 

Norman v Norman [2017] EWCA Civ 120, [2017] All ER (D) 178 (Mar)

 

R (on the application of Unaenergy Group Holding Pte Ltd and others) v Director of the Serious Fraud Office [2017] EWHC 600 (Admin), [2017] All ER (D) 189 (Mar)

Wood v Capita Insurance Services Ltd [2017] UKSC 24, [2017] All ER (D) 182 (Mar)

“It is as close to granting the reader a free, direct advice-line to counsel, as the joint heads of Serjeants’ Inn are ever likely to permit”

R (on the application of Duggan) v Assistant Deputy Coroner for the Northern District of Greater London [2017] EWCA Civ 142, [2017] All ER (D) 179 (Mar)

There are reasons for giving reasons in planning decisions, says Nicholas Dobson

Show
10
Results
Results
10
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde Co strengthens energy transition and construction offering with hire of Suriya Ashok

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

NEWS
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
Arbitration may be private, but its confidentiality is no impenetrable shield. Writing in NLJ this week, James Glaysher of Kingsley Napley examines when courts will permit arbitral material to surface in open litigation
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

back-to-top-scroll