R (on the application of DA and others) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (Shelter intervening) [2017] EWHC 1446 (Admin), [2017] All ER (D) 129 (Jun)
Re Mason & Sons Ltd (in creditors’ voluntary liquidation); Richardson and another v White and another [2017] EWHC 1512 (Ch), [2017] All ER (D) 141 (Jun)
R (on the application of Rahman) v Local Government Election Court [2017] EWHC 1413 (Admin), [2017] All ER (D) 126 (Jun)
Thornhill v Bagas [2017] EWHC 1513 (QB), [2017] All ER (D) 139 (Jun)
Sharp v Sharp [2017] EWCA Civ 408, [2017] All ER (D) 74 (Jun)
Halborg v EMW Law LLP [2017] EWCA Civ 793, [2017] All ER (D) 147 (Jun)
C21 London Estates Ltd v Maurice MacNeill Iona Ltd [2017] EWHC 998 (Ch), [2017] All ER (D) 142 (Jun)
Astex Therapeutics Ltd v Astrazeneca AB [2017] EWHC 1442 (Ch), [2017] All ER (D) 118 (Jun)
Lobo v Corich; Corich v Lobo [2017] EWHC 1438 (TCC), [2017] All ER (D) 132 (Jun)
Letter to the editor
Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating
Global finance group strengthened by returning partner in London
West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire
The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ