header-logo header-logo

THIS ISSUE
Card image

Issue: Vol 157, Issue 7279

28 June 2007
IN THIS ISSUE

Boehringer Ingelheim Ltd v Vetplus Ltd [2007] EWCA Civ 584, [2007] All ER (D) 221 (Jun)

Judges are unfairly singled out for being lenient and the sentencing system is “working as intended”, a senior judge insists.

European Commission v United Kingdom (Case C-127/05), [2007] All ER (D) 126 (Jun)

Trade mark owners will find it more difficult to protect their brands from competitors’ comparative adverts following a Court of Appeal ruling, commercial firm Wedlake Bell is warning.

Wood v Rost [2007] All ER (D) 198 (Jun)

In brief

R v Harries [2007] All ER (D) 48 (Jun)

ICI Chemicals & Polymers Ltd v TTE Training Ltd [2007] All ER (D) 115 (Jun)

Alec Samuels questions whether the new offence of death by careless driving will improve safety and justice on the roads

In brief

Show
10
Results
Results
10
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
Can a meticulously maintained spreadsheet turn a couple’s informal financial arrangements into legally enforceable obligations? 
back-to-top-scroll