header-logo header-logo

THIS ISSUE
Card image

Issue: Vol 157, Issue 7286

16 August 2007
IN THIS ISSUE

In brief

Vincent Smith considers how cartel victims could benefit from EU enforcement and compensation initiatives

R (F (Mongolia)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2007] EWCA Civ 769, [2007] All ER (D) 384 (Jul)

Director of Public Prosecutions v Haw [2007] EWHC 1931 (Admin), [2007] All ER (D) 29 (Aug)

Director of Assets Recovery Agency v Szepietowski [2007] EWCA Civ 766, [2007] All ER (D) 364 (Jul)

Digby v East Cambridgeshire District Council [2007] IRLR 585

R (Kelly) v Warley Magistrates’ Court [2007] EWHC 1836 (Admin), [2007] All ER (D) 506 (Jul)

Murray (by his litigation friends) v Express Newspapers plc [2007] EWHC 1908, [2007] All ER (D) 39 (Aug)

Who should decide the parameters of justice?

Amjad and ors v Steadman-Byrne [2007] EWCA Civ 625, [2007] All ER (D) 348 (Jun)

Show
10
Results
Results
10
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

EIP—Stuart Malcolm

EIP—Stuart Malcolm

EIP strengthens Commercial practice with a new partner

Ellisons—Francesca Brown

Ellisons—Francesca Brown

Ellisons welcomes Francesca Brown to Family team

Shakespeare Martineau—Marie Bourke

Shakespeare Martineau—Marie Bourke

Shakespeare Martineau strengthens Sheffield regulatory practice with new hires

NEWS
A wide-ranging Civil Way column highlights developments from insolvency procedure to employment law, but one case stands out for its lessons on bankruptcy, family homes and digital communications
A sprawling Intellectual Property Office battle between House of Fraser and Frasers Property has delivered a masterclass in modern trade mark law
Courts in England and Wales and Singapore are increasingly confronting complex disputes over international child relocation as families become more globally mobile
The government’s long-awaited family law reform consultation could mark a turning point for domestic abuse victims navigating financial remedy proceedings, but significant challenges remain
A new commercial court pilot giving the public access to documents used in hearings, including expert reports, is raising difficult questions about transparency and privacy
back-to-top-scroll