header-logo header-logo

THIS ISSUE
Card image

Issue: Vol 160, Issue 7421

10 June 2010
IN THIS ISSUE

Nicholas Dobson reports on the pitch battle between Sainsbury’s & Tesco

Ashton Davies outlines how to respond to information requests

Huntress Search Ltd v Canapeum Ltd and another [2010] EWHC 1270 (QB), [2010] All ER (D) 285 (May)

Michael Tringham stresses the importance of beating the clock

Nick Bird reports on the Levicom outcome & lessons in causation

Ajinomoto Sweetners Europe SAS v Asda Stores Ltd [2010] EWCA Civ 609, [2010] All ER (D) 03 (Jun)

HJ Heinz Co Ltd v EFL Inc (a Company registered in Belize) [2010] EWHC 1203 (Comm), [2010] All ER (D) 01 (Jun)

Mark Lawrence reports on contractual rights & expectations

Third party claims against insurers—a new era, or more of the same, asks Alison Padfield

Dr David Hewitt will be a name familiar to most NLJ readers, especially mental health lawyers.

Show
10
Results
Results
10
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Steven James

Pillsbury—Steven James

Firm boosts London IP capability with high-profile technology sector hire

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Private client specialist joins as partner in Taunton office

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

Finance and restructuring offering strengthened by partner hire in London

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll