header-logo header-logo

THIS ISSUE
Card image

Issue: Vol 160, Issue 7431

02 September 2010
IN THIS ISSUE

Deutsche Bank AG v Sebastian Holdings Inc [2010] EWCA Civ 998, [2010] All ER (D) 98 (Aug)

Oliver Assersohn analyses the first FSA initiated prosecution for insider trading to end in acquittal

Are you prepared for Practice Direction 31B, ask Catherine Reeves & Mark Surguy

Gavin Foggo & Molly Ahmed examine potential future trends in dispute resolution

Simon Duncan reports on contractual agreements in the Supreme Court

HMCS reckons that its catering services at too many courts have provided unappealing food with little choice.

R (on the application of PM) v Hertfordshire County Council [2010] EWHC 2056 (Admin), [2010] All ER (D) 28 (Aug)

Rubin and another v Eurofinance SA and others [2010] EWCA Civ 895, [2010] All ER (D) 358 (Jul)

Human rights issues have been increasingly creeping into the nooks and crannies of family law over the last decade.

Fears as substantial number of family firms fail bidding round

Show
10
Results
Results
10
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde Co strengthens energy transition and construction offering with hire of Suriya Ashok

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

NEWS
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
Arbitration may be private, but its confidentiality is no impenetrable shield. Writing in NLJ this week, James Glaysher of Kingsley Napley examines when courts will permit arbitral material to surface in open litigation
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

back-to-top-scroll