header-logo header-logo

THIS ISSUE
Card image

Issue: Vol 161, Issue 7466

19 May 2011
IN THIS ISSUE

Mosley v United Kingdom [2011] ECHR 48009/08, [2011] All ER (D) 66 (May)

Barr and others v Biffa Waste Services Ltd (No 4) [2011] EWHC 1107 (TCC), [2011] All ER (D) 77 (May)

JSC BTA Bank v Ablyazov and others [2011] EWHC 1136 (Comm), [2011] All ER (D) 81 (May)

R (on the application of Adams)(FC) v Secretary of State for Justice [2011] UKSC 18, [2011] All ER (D) 87 (May)

Masri v Consolidated Contractors International SAL and others [2011] EWHC 1024 (Comm), [2011] All ER (D) 78 (May)

Renwick and another v Simon and Michael Brooke Architects and other companies [2011] EWHC 874 (TCC), [2011] All ER (D) 36 (May)

To what extent (if at all) can the lack of equity in a property be taken into account by the court...

Is there an obligation on the part of a divorce petition respondent who seeks a cross-decree...

I assume that the inspection procedure against third parties under FPR rule 21.2 will allow inspection by the judge at court...

I do not understand how FPR rule 33.3(2)(b) will work...

Show
10
Results
Results
10
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll