header-logo header-logo

THIS ISSUE
Card image

Issue: Vol 162, Issue 7505

13 March 2012
IN THIS ISSUE

Ibuna and another v Arroyo and another [2012] EWHC 428 (Ch), [2012] All ER (D) 36 (Mar)

Adobe Systems Incorporated v Netcom Online.co.uk Ltd and another [2012] EWHC 446 (Ch), [2012] All ER (D) 42 (Mar)

McKillen v Misland (Cyprus) Investments Ltd and another [2012] EWCA Civ 179, [2012] All ER (D) 41 (Mar)

R (on the application of NM) v Islington London Borough Council [2012] EWHC 414 (Admin), [2012] All ER (D) 35 (Mar)

A Local Authority v H [2012] EWHC 49 (COP), [2012] All ER (D) 34 (Mar)

An Informer v A Chief Constable [2012] EWCA Civ 197, [2012] All ER (D) 31 (Mar)

Snippets from The Reduced Law Dictionary by Roderick Ramage

“Locked-in syndrome” patient wins right to take his case to the High Court

Senior judge calls for “quick win” for family justice reform

ABSs & LDPs will be the practice structure of choice, predicts legal expert

Show
10
Results
Results
10
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll