header-logo header-logo

THIS ISSUE
Card image

Issue: Vol 162, Issue 7516

31 May 2012
IN THIS ISSUE

Blair v Chief Constable of Sussex Police [2012] EWCA Civ 633, [2012] All ER (D) 135 (May)

Tinkler and another v Elliott [2012] EWHC 600 (QB), [2012] All ER (D) 125 (May)

Dominic Regan takes the MoJ to task over plans for an employer’s liability portal

Lawyers have been invited to take part in a campaign to show solidarity with lawyers imprisoned or murdered simply for carrying out their professional duty.

John McMullen examines the latest round of judicial activity on TUPE

Amanda Melton argues against pigeonholing families within the law

Peter Paschalis joins Burlingtons Legal as partner in its real estate team.

Bond Pearce has recruited Matt Starling as associate in its regulatory practice in its Bristol office.

A much asked question among those with an interest in international criminal justice over recent months is: where is justice best served? asks Kathryn Howarth

Birketts has expanded its mediation team to make it easier for disputing parties to avoid the high costs of formal court action and to reach a quicker resolution.

Show
10
Results
Results
10
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde Co strengthens energy transition and construction offering with hire of Suriya Ashok

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

NEWS
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
Arbitration may be private, but its confidentiality is no impenetrable shield. Writing in NLJ this week, James Glaysher of Kingsley Napley examines when courts will permit arbitral material to surface in open litigation
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

back-to-top-scroll