header-logo header-logo

THIS ISSUE
Card image

Issue: Vol 162, Issue 7535

23 October 2012
IN THIS ISSUE

An NHS trust v H and others [2012] All ER (D) 110 (Oct)

Revenue and Customs Commissioners v Sunico A/S and others [2012] All ER (D) 172 (Oct)

Samsung Electronics (UK) Ltd v Apple Inc [2012] EWCA Civ 1339, [2012] All ER (D) 176 (Oct)

Patterson v Ministry of Defence [2012] EWHC 2767 (QB), [2012] All ER (D) 127 (Oct)

Snippets from Roderick Ramage of The Reduced law Dictionary

The HLE blog releases a policy paper calling for action against sexual violence against men in conflict zones

Achievements of the legal profession celebrated

New executive director for RPC Asia

EU competition specialist recruited by DWF

New partner joins Penningtons' Cambridge office

Show
10
Results
Results
10
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Slater Heelis—Charlotte Beck

Slater Heelis—Charlotte Beck

Partner and Manchester office lead appointed head of family

Civil Justice Council—Nigel Teasdale

Civil Justice Council—Nigel Teasdale

DWF insurance services director appointed to Civil Justice Council

R3—Jodie Wildridge

R3—Jodie Wildridge

Kings Chambers barrister appointed chair of R3 Yorkshire

NEWS

The abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC

Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll