header-logo header-logo

profile-sm_7

Mark Hill KC

Barrister

Mark Hill KC practises at Francis Taylor Building, Inner Temple and was a member of the legal team acting for the respondent in the Supreme Court. He is Honorary Professor at the Centre for Law and Religion at Cardiff University (Mark.Hill@ftb.eu.com)

Barrister

Mark Hill KC practises at Francis Taylor Building, Inner Temple and was a member of the legal team acting for the respondent in the Supreme Court. He is Honorary Professor at the Centre for Law and Religion at Cardiff University (Mark.Hill@ftb.eu.com)

ARTICLES BY THIS AUTHOR

What legal obligations are owed to the servants of God? Mark Hill QC discusses the judgment & impact of Preston

Mark Hill QC considers the “reasonable accommodation” of religious belief in UK law

Nothing succeeds like a success fee: not even an exaggerated claim or one funded by a non-party, says Mark Hill QC

Professor Mark Hill QC & Spencer Keen investigate a legal minefield

Show
8
Results
Results
8
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Browne Jacobson—Vicky Tomlinson

Browne Jacobson—Vicky Tomlinson

Browne Jacobson appoints Vicky Tomlinson as Head of Independent Health and Care

DWF—five appointments

DWF—five appointments

DWF further strengthens major injury and casualty offering with new partner and four directors from DAC Beachcroft

Switalskis—Laura Ornsby

Switalskis—Laura Ornsby

Switalskis strengthens Grimsby child care team

NEWS
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
Arbitration may be private, but its confidentiality is no impenetrable shield. Writing in NLJ this week, James Glaysher of Kingsley Napley examines when courts will permit arbitral material to surface in open litigation
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

back-to-top-scroll