header-logo header-logo

profile-sm_7

Spencer Keen

Barrister

Spencer Keen is a barrister at Old Square (keen@oldsquare.co.ukwww.oldsquare.co.uk)

Barrister

Spencer Keen is a barrister at Old Square (keen@oldsquare.co.ukwww.oldsquare.co.uk)

ARTICLES BY THIS AUTHOR

Employers do not owe a duty to make reasonable adjustments for persons who are not disabled, says Spencer Keen

It is difficult not to be impressed by the depth of knowledge that must underpin this sort of writing

European Directives strike again Spencer Keen & Monika Sobiecki investigate

Spencer Keen explores Autoclenz & the unique status of employment contracts

Spencer Keen tackles the muddied waters of disability discrimination

Spencer Keen provides an overview of the most significant provisions of the Equality Act 2010

How will the case of Edwards influence the future of wrongful dismissal claims? Spencer Keen & Jennifer Lee report

Professor Mark Hill QC & Spencer Keen investigate a legal minefield

Show
8
Results
Results
8
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Boodle Hatfield—Tom McLaughlin

Boodle Hatfield—Tom McLaughlin

Boodle Hatfield welcomes new employment partner, Tom McLaughlin

Arc Pensions Law—Victoria Thompson-Hill, Jonathan Mason & Georgi Ivanov

Arc Pensions Law—Victoria Thompson-Hill, Jonathan Mason & Georgi Ivanov

National specialist pensions law firm strengthens team with three new appointments

Jurit—Christian Abletshauser

Jurit—Christian Abletshauser

Jurit appoints Christian Abletshauser to lead family law practice

NEWS
Burges Salmon appoints Benn Richards to strengthen Contentious Insolvency offering
A High Court decision has clarified that a home may be unfit for human habitation not only where conditions endanger health or safety, but also where they seriously undermine comfort and convenience

A longer time limit for employment tribunal claims, new charity law thresholds, property tribunal recruitment and appellate guidance on small-claims costs feature in the latest Civil Way round-up

A recent High Court ruling could make issue estoppel considerably more complex in cross-border litigation, requiring parties to consider the foreign law governing the underlying claim
The Supreme Court has overturned Cheshire West’s bright-line test for deprivation of liberty, replacing it with a broader, more contextual assessment that gives greater weight to an individual’s wishes, feelings and apparent consent
back-to-top-scroll