header-logo header-logo

Ancillary relief

Subscribe

Marital agreements: who’s got it right? Kate Molan & Sarah Caroline Boyle

How do you protect a client’s PI damages prior to family proceedings, asks Margaret Hatwood

Can information disclosed in family proceedings be released to particular individuals or bodies, asks David Burrows

Ancillary relief v confiscation proceedings: what takes priority, asks Sarah Wood

Jamie Wilson reports on uncertain times in a post Imerman era

Fiona Bethel & Hannah Bunker consider the treatment of compensation in ancillary relief

Ancillary Relief

Legislation news update

Tarn Insurance Services Ltd (in administration) v Kirby [2009] EWCA Civ 19, [2009] All ER (D) 211 (Jan)

The statutory legacy for bereaved spouses and civil partners has been doubled (from 1 February 2009).

Show
10
Results
Results
10
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Boodle Hatfield—Tom McLaughlin

Boodle Hatfield—Tom McLaughlin

Boodle Hatfield welcomes new employment partner, Tom McLaughlin

Arc Pensions Law—Victoria Thompson-Hill, Jonathan Mason & Georgi Ivanov

Arc Pensions Law—Victoria Thompson-Hill, Jonathan Mason & Georgi Ivanov

National specialist pensions law firm strengthens team with three new appointments

Jurit—Christian Abletshauser

Jurit—Christian Abletshauser

Jurit appoints Christian Abletshauser to lead family law practice

NEWS
Burges Salmon appoints Benn Richards to strengthen Contentious Insolvency offering
A High Court decision has clarified that a home may be unfit for human habitation not only where conditions endanger health or safety, but also where they seriously undermine comfort and convenience

A longer time limit for employment tribunal claims, new charity law thresholds, property tribunal recruitment and appellate guidance on small-claims costs feature in the latest Civil Way round-up

A recent High Court ruling could make issue estoppel considerably more complex in cross-border litigation, requiring parties to consider the foreign law governing the underlying claim
The Supreme Court has overturned Cheshire West’s bright-line test for deprivation of liberty, replacing it with a broader, more contextual assessment that gives greater weight to an individual’s wishes, feelings and apparent consent
back-to-top-scroll