Auguring the future. Nicholas Bevan concludes his analysis of Thompstone
Bailey (by her father and litigation friend) v Ministry of Defence and another [2008] EWCA Civ 883, [2008] All ER (D) 382 (Jul)
Was the withdrawal of legal aid from personal injury (PI) cases an inspired gamble that has paid off? Or has it been an “access to justice” disaster leaving many accident victims without proper compensation or adequate specialist advice?
Legal news
Conister Trust Ltd v John Hardman & Co and another [2008] EWCA Civ 841, [2008] All ER (D) 273 (Jul)
Is it time to revisit the illegality rule, asks Richard Scorer
Book Reviews
CLAIMS RECORDS CENTRAL COMPUTER SYSTEMS RESPONSIBILITY
INTERPRETATION OF EQUIPMENT REGULATIONS PI DAMAGES FOR PUBLIC NUISANCE
Shakespeare Martineau strengthens Sheffield regulatory practice with new hires
Sackers recruits new associates
Firm bolsters senior team with head of corporate and head of employment