header-logo header-logo

Personal injury

Subscribe

Christopher Russell discusses nervous shock and fraudulent claims

Christopher Russell unravels recent cases involving limitation and loss of chance

Personal injury experts say government should follow Scotland’s lead on compensation

Crofts v Murton [2008] All ER (D) 25 (Sep)

Nicholas Dobson wonders how far prospective defendants need to go in taking steps to avoid mishap?

Collett v Smith and another [2008] EWHC 1962, [2008] All ER (D) 74 (Aug)

Settling damages for latex allergies may involve a trip to court in future, says David Cartwright

Monk v PC Harrington Ltd [2008] EWHC 1879, [2008] All ER (D) 20 (Aug)

How is Thompstone impacting on periodical payments orders? ask Angela Piears and Hugh Potter

Brent McDonald discusses recent cases involving negligence and statutory duty

Show
10
Results
Results
10
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Shakespeare Martineau—Marie Bourke

Shakespeare Martineau—Marie Bourke

Shakespeare Martineau strengthens Sheffield regulatory practice with new hires

Sackers—Louise McRae & Annabella Hwang

Sackers—Louise McRae & Annabella Hwang

Sackers recruits new associates

McHale & Co—Shaun Little & Patrick Byrne

McHale & Co—Shaun Little & Patrick Byrne

McHale Co bolsters senior team with head of corporate and head of employment

NEWS
A wide-ranging Civil Way column highlights developments from insolvency procedure to employment law, but one case stands out for its lessons on bankruptcy, family homes and digital communications
A sprawling Intellectual Property Office battle between House of Fraser and Frasers Property has delivered a masterclass in modern trade mark law
Courts in England and Wales and Singapore are increasingly confronting complex disputes over international child relocation as families become more globally mobile
A new commercial court pilot giving the public access to documents used in hearings, including expert reports, is raising difficult questions about transparency and privacy
A High Court ruling has clarified the limits of digital communications in disputes over property ownership
back-to-top-scroll