header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us

Case law

Subscribe
Mental health Premium Content

MASM v MMAM and others [2015] EWCOP 3, [2015] All ER (D) 238 (Jan)

13 February 2015
Minor Premium Content

Re M (Children) (Republic of Ireland) (Child’s Objections) (Joinder of Children as parties to appeal) [2015] EWCA Civ 26, [2015] All ER (D) 03 (Feb)

13 February 2015
Sentence Premium Content

Hutchinson v United Kingdom (App No 57592/08), [2015] All ER (D) 17 (Feb)

13 February 2015
Uniting family & civil Premium Content
13 February 2015
Four tenants: one claimant Premium Content
13 February 2015
Absent undertakers Premium Content
13 February 2015
“It’s for you, judge” Premium Content
13 February 2015
No hearing, no refund Premium Content
13 February 2015
Accelerated counterclaim Premium Content
13 February 2015
Company Premium Content

Changtel Solutions UK Ltd (formerly Enta Technologies Ltd) v Revenue and Customs Commissioners [2015] EWCA Civ 29, [2015] All ER (D) 211 (Jan)

06 February 2015
Show
10
Results
Results
10
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Pillsbury—Steven James

Pillsbury—Steven James

Firm boosts London IP capability with high-profile technology sector hire

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Private client specialist joins as partner in Taunton office

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

Finance and restructuring offering strengthened by partner hire in London

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Mazur under scrutiny
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
NLJ this week: Does dishonesty always mean strike-off?
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
NLJ this week: Potanin, prenups & privacy
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
NLJ this week: Malaysia’s arbitration overhaul
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
NLJ this week: Greed but no fraud in £1.4bn SKAT case
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll