header-logo header-logo

£70K shrub squabble

31 July 2009
Issue: 7380 / Categories: Legal News , Public
printer mail-detail

Six square metres of shrubs has cost two neighbours £70,000 in dispute that will continue in the Court of Appeal this autumn.

Cheltenham neighbours Martin Charalambous and Dr Welding will now resume their fight over a worthless patch of pyrocanthus shrubs after Mr Justice Jacob granted Charalambous permission to appeal, but urged the neighbours to consider mediation.

Last December, Gloucester County Court ruled in favour of Welding’s claim that the Land Registry records showed the boundary between their properties, and ordered Charalambous to pay £70,000 costs. Charalambous, on the other hand, maintains that the line of bushes marks the boundary. Charalambous’s solicitor, Conrad Gadd of Gadd and Co, says: “Everyone ought to sit down and negotiate. Our point of view is we’d like to. But it’s not very likely.”

Tim Wallis, mediator, North West Mediation Solutions, says a dispute of this sort would typically cost about £5,000–£6,000, once solicitors’ fees for both sides were taken into account, if they opted for mediation.

“People want their day in court, but that doesn’t actually give you a chance

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll