header-logo header-logo

31 July 2009
Issue: 7380 / Categories: Legal News , Public
printer mail-detail

£70K shrub squabble

Six square metres of shrubs has cost two neighbours £70,000 in dispute that will continue in the Court of Appeal this autumn.

Cheltenham neighbours Martin Charalambous and Dr Welding will now resume their fight over a worthless patch of pyrocanthus shrubs after Mr Justice Jacob granted Charalambous permission to appeal, but urged the neighbours to consider mediation.

Last December, Gloucester County Court ruled in favour of Welding’s claim that the Land Registry records showed the boundary between their properties, and ordered Charalambous to pay £70,000 costs. Charalambous, on the other hand, maintains that the line of bushes marks the boundary. Charalambous’s solicitor, Conrad Gadd of Gadd and Co, says: “Everyone ought to sit down and negotiate. Our point of view is we’d like to. But it’s not very likely.”

Tim Wallis, mediator, North West Mediation Solutions, says a dispute of this sort would typically cost about £5,000–£6,000, once solicitors’ fees for both sides were taken into account, if they opted for mediation.

“People want their day in court, but that doesn’t actually give you a chance

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde Co strengthens energy transition and construction offering with hire of Suriya Ashok

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

NEWS
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
Arbitration may be private, but its confidentiality is no impenetrable shield. Writing in NLJ this week, James Glaysher of Kingsley Napley examines when courts will permit arbitral material to surface in open litigation
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

back-to-top-scroll