header-logo header-logo

31 July 2009
Issue: 7380 / Categories: Legal News , Public
printer mail-detail

£70K shrub squabble

Six square metres of shrubs has cost two neighbours £70,000 in dispute that will continue in the Court of Appeal this autumn.

Cheltenham neighbours Martin Charalambous and Dr Welding will now resume their fight over a worthless patch of pyrocanthus shrubs after Mr Justice Jacob granted Charalambous permission to appeal, but urged the neighbours to consider mediation.

Last December, Gloucester County Court ruled in favour of Welding’s claim that the Land Registry records showed the boundary between their properties, and ordered Charalambous to pay £70,000 costs. Charalambous, on the other hand, maintains that the line of bushes marks the boundary. Charalambous’s solicitor, Conrad Gadd of Gadd and Co, says: “Everyone ought to sit down and negotiate. Our point of view is we’d like to. But it’s not very likely.”

Tim Wallis, mediator, North West Mediation Solutions, says a dispute of this sort would typically cost about £5,000–£6,000, once solicitors’ fees for both sides were taken into account, if they opted for mediation.

“People want their day in court, but that doesn’t actually give you a chance

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll