header-logo header-logo

20 November 2019
Issue: 7865 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

A smart future for cryptoassets?

The legal status of smart contracts and cryptoassets under English law has been confirmed by a taskforce chaired by the Chancellor of the High Court

A legal statement, published this week by the UK Jurisdiction Taskforce of the Lawtech Delivery Panel, which is chaired by Sir Geoffrey Vos, clarifies that smart contracts are enforceable agreements and cryptoassets are tradeable property. It also answers questions regarding their classification and characterisation under English law.

The statement is significant because legal uncertainty surrounding the status of smart contracts and cryptoassets is often cited as the biggest obstacle to their use under English law. The taskforce’s statement could revolutionise their use. For example, smart contracts could be applied to mortgage transactions, allowing both parties to digitally agree to the sale before processing the payment, making the process more secure and reducing the likelihood of fraud.

It will also encourage investment, giving investors more confidence of their rights.

Sir Geoffrey said: ‘In legal terms, cryptoassets and smart contracts undoubtedly represent the future.

‘I hope that the legal statement will go a long way towards providing much needed market confidence, legal certainty and predictability in areas that are of great importance to the technological and legal communities and to the global financial services industry.’

Globally, the smart contract market is expected to reach $300m by 2023, and the World Economic Forum predicts 10% of global gross domestic product will be stored on the blockchain by 2027.

Simon Davis, president of the Law Society (pictured) said the clarification would be ‘gladly received by the profession’.

‘Under English common law, cryptoassets should be treated in principle as property and smart contracts considered capable of meeting the requirements for contract formation until such matters can come before the courts,’ he said.

‘Once again, this demonstrates the renowned flexibility of English common law to grow and adapt. It will increase confidence among law firms to adopt new technologies and among investors to invest. The adoption of new technologies could drive productivity growth in the legal sector up from 1.3% per year to 2.7% per year. And every £1 spent on legal services supports £1.39 in spending across the entire UK economy.’

Tim Snaith, partner at law firm Winckworth Sherwood, added a note of caution: ‘Whilst this may be a step forward, the laws surrounding cryptocurrencies and other digital assets, particular on death, are a long way behind. These types of assets are less than a generation old, so the issues that can (and will) arise when someone dies holding them are only just coming to light.

 ‘As with any asset, it is so important to plan and think about what might happen to the asset in the event of death or loss of mental capacity. For many assets (for example bank accounts), there are established systems and processes in place to assist in these circumstances. In the case of digital assets, however, these systems are only just being designed or thought about, so a lot of care is needed.’

Issue: 7865 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Chief information officer appointment strengthens technology leadership

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Firm strengthens Wilmslow team with two solicitor appointments

DWF—Ian Plumley

DWF—Ian Plumley

Londoninsurance and reinsurance practice announces partner appointment

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll