header-logo header-logo

Added protection

25 September 2009 / Sarfraz Khan
Issue: 7386 / Categories: Features , Discrimination , Employment
printer mail-detail

More people are now potentially classed as disabled & so entitled to protection

Elizabeth Boyle worked for SCA Packaging Ltd (the company) in Northern Ireland from 1969 until 2002. In 1975 she experienced voice problems caused by vocal nodes, which recurred in 1981 and 1992. She has subsequently followed a strict voice management regime to avoid recurrence.

In 2000, a new manager threatened to remove the partition separating the office where Mrs Boyle worked from the stock control room. She feared the impact this would have in managing her health condition. The company took occupational health advice, but insisted the partition should go.
Mrs Boyle presented disability discrimination claims to the Northern Ireland industrial tribunals (NIIT). Further claims of discrimination, victimisation and unfair dismissal after she was made redundant were consolidated.

The legislation

The Disability Discrimination Act 1995 (DDA 1995) primarily provides rights to, and prohibits discrimination against people who are themselves defined as disabled. This includes people who have had a disability in the past, though non-disabled people are protected from victimisation and

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Sian Langer & Gemma Parker

Clyde & Co—Sian Langer & Gemma Parker

Firm strengthens catastrophic injury capability with partner promotions

DWF—Dean Gormley

DWF—Dean Gormley

Finance and restructuring team offering expands in Manchester with partner hire

Taylor Rose—Vicki Maflin

Taylor Rose—Vicki Maflin

Firm announces appointment of head of remortgage

NEWS
The long-awaited Getty Images v Stability AI judgment arrived at the end of last year—but not with the seismic impact many expected. In this week's issue of NLJ, experts from Arnold & Porter dissect a ruling that is ‘historic’ yet tightly confined
The UK Supreme Court may be deciding fewer cases, but its impact in 2025 was anything but muted. In this week's NLJ, Professor Emeritus Brice Dickson of Queen’s University Belfast reviews a year marked by historically low output, a striking rise in jointly authored judgments, and a continued decline in dissent. High-profile rulings on biological sex under the Equality Act, public access to Dartmoor, and fairness in sexual offence trials ensured the court’s voice carried far beyond the Strand
Delays at HM Land Registry are no longer a background irritation but a growing source of professional risk. Writing in NLJ this week, Phil Murrin of DAC Beachcroft explores how the ‘registration gap’—now stretching up to two years in complex cases—is fuelling client frustration, priority disputes, and negligence claims
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
back-to-top-scroll