header-logo header-logo

16 March 2012 / Ian Smith
Issue: 7505 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Alarming times?

108174927_4

Ian Smith sweeps through a month of change, disputed rest breaks & contract setbacks

Last month saw the coalition government’s agenda on legislative reform of employment law start to come through in drafted legislation. Finalised regulations were enacted on compromise agreements in discrimination cases and tribunal procedure (raising amounts for deposits and costs/expenses orders, allowing costs for witnesses and providing that witness statements are to be taken as read) and drafts were produced on raising the unfair dismissal qualifying period to two years and permitting judge-only tribunals in unfair dismissal cases. All in all a busy time, with more to come. Politically the suggested reform which fared worst was the idea that small firms should be able to dismiss incapable employees without facing a tribunal, which now appears to be a source of disagreement within the coalition. Watch this space on that one.

On the litigation front, the cases selected for comment in this column lie at the “technical” end of the employment law spectrum and concern the time limit for working time claims, and

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Orwins—Maryam Abbasi

Orwins—Maryam Abbasi

Senior associate joins family law team in London

Tees Law—Stephen Williams

Tees Law—Stephen Williams

Firm appoints chief financial officer as it expands Essex office footprint

Winckworth Sherwood—David Fendt

Winckworth Sherwood—David Fendt

Restructuring and insolvency practice strengthened by partner hire

NEWS
Some employment law controversies never disappear—they merely lie dormant
Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming legal practice, but its successful adoption depends as much on culture as technology
The fallout from Lord Mandelson’s appointment and dismissal as UK ambassador to Washington raises profound questions about constitutional governance, accountability and political appointments
Pastries may be in the firing line while kebabs escape scrutiny, but the reality is far more nuanced
The Supreme Court’s decision in Dillon highlights a central tension in modern public law: rights may be recognised without being fully realised
back-to-top-scroll