header-logo header-logo

Alarming times?

16 March 2012 / Ian Smith
Issue: 7505 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail
108174927_4

Ian Smith sweeps through a month of change, disputed rest breaks & contract setbacks

Last month saw the coalition government’s agenda on legislative reform of employment law start to come through in drafted legislation. Finalised regulations were enacted on compromise agreements in discrimination cases and tribunal procedure (raising amounts for deposits and costs/expenses orders, allowing costs for witnesses and providing that witness statements are to be taken as read) and drafts were produced on raising the unfair dismissal qualifying period to two years and permitting judge-only tribunals in unfair dismissal cases. All in all a busy time, with more to come. Politically the suggested reform which fared worst was the idea that small firms should be able to dismiss incapable employees without facing a tribunal, which now appears to be a source of disagreement within the coalition. Watch this space on that one.

On the litigation front, the cases selected for comment in this column lie at the “technical” end of the employment law spectrum and concern the time limit for working time claims, and

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll