header-logo header-logo

16 March 2012 / Ian Smith
Issue: 7505 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Alarming times?

108174927_4

Ian Smith sweeps through a month of change, disputed rest breaks & contract setbacks

Last month saw the coalition government’s agenda on legislative reform of employment law start to come through in drafted legislation. Finalised regulations were enacted on compromise agreements in discrimination cases and tribunal procedure (raising amounts for deposits and costs/expenses orders, allowing costs for witnesses and providing that witness statements are to be taken as read) and drafts were produced on raising the unfair dismissal qualifying period to two years and permitting judge-only tribunals in unfair dismissal cases. All in all a busy time, with more to come. Politically the suggested reform which fared worst was the idea that small firms should be able to dismiss incapable employees without facing a tribunal, which now appears to be a source of disagreement within the coalition. Watch this space on that one.

On the litigation front, the cases selected for comment in this column lie at the “technical” end of the employment law spectrum and concern the time limit for working time claims, and

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Womble Bond Dickinson—Paula Myers

Womble Bond Dickinson—Paula Myers

Womble Bond Dickinson appoints Paula Myers to private capital team in Leeds

mfg Solicitors—five promotions

mfg Solicitors—five promotions

Law firm mfg Solicitors announces five promotions at Birmingham office

Brabners—six promotions

Brabners—six promotions

Brabners adds six to partnership in record year for partner promotions

NEWS

Family set expands with the formal integration of 4 Brick Court into 42BR Barristers

The Court of Appeal has issued a stern warning to lawyers engaging in the practice of ‘privilege hunting’—obtaining an opponent’s legally privileged information through dishonest means
Legal executives have given a lukewarm reception to the Legal Services Board’s (LSB’s) final report from its regulatory review into Mazur advice and guidance
A homeless single parent offered accommodation in Derby has lost her Supreme Court appeal against the London council making the offer
The Kingdom of Bahrain does not enjoy sovereign immunity from allegations it used surveillance software to spy on dissidents in the UK, the Supreme Court has held
back-to-top-scroll