header-logo header-logo

16 March 2012 / Ian Smith
Issue: 7505 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Alarming times?

108174927_4

Ian Smith sweeps through a month of change, disputed rest breaks & contract setbacks

Last month saw the coalition government’s agenda on legislative reform of employment law start to come through in drafted legislation. Finalised regulations were enacted on compromise agreements in discrimination cases and tribunal procedure (raising amounts for deposits and costs/expenses orders, allowing costs for witnesses and providing that witness statements are to be taken as read) and drafts were produced on raising the unfair dismissal qualifying period to two years and permitting judge-only tribunals in unfair dismissal cases. All in all a busy time, with more to come. Politically the suggested reform which fared worst was the idea that small firms should be able to dismiss incapable employees without facing a tribunal, which now appears to be a source of disagreement within the coalition. Watch this space on that one.

On the litigation front, the cases selected for comment in this column lie at the “technical” end of the employment law spectrum and concern the time limit for working time claims, and

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll