header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
24 July 2013 / Janet Barlow , Rebecca Mason
Issue: 7570 / Categories: Features , Public , Human rights
printer mail-detail

All marriages are equal...

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
169856308_0

...but some are more equal than others, say Janet Barlow & Rebecca Mason

The controversial Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Act received royal assent last week. This Act is a ground-breaking piece of legislation which aims to put same sex couples on a level footing with that of heterosexual couples in relation to the institution of “marriage”. The Act will enable same sex couples to marry either in a civil ceremony or, if in agreement with the religious organisation, in a religious ceremony. The Civil Partnership Act 2004 (CPA 2004) had already given same sex couples the ability to make a legally recognised commitment to one another. However, this has never been regarded as a marriage due to Canon law. The Submission of the Clergy Act 1533, Canon B30, states that “the Church of England affirms, according to our Lord’s teaching that marriage is in its nature a union permanent and lifelong, for better for worse, till death them do part, of one man with one woman...” This was reaffirmed by

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Partner joinscorporate and finance practice in British Virgin Islands

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Firm strengthens children department with adoption and surrogacy expert

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Media and technology expert joins employment team as partner in Cambridge

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Divorce ‘nuclear weapon’ freezes assets but entangles outsiders
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
NLJ this week: What counts as ‘rent’? Court says labour alone won’t do
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Your magistrates’ court needs you!
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
NLJ this week: Freed but failed—justice system leaves the innocent empty-handed
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
NLJ this week: Clarity on whistleblowing, settlements and tribunal limits
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll