header-logo header-logo

24 July 2013 / Janet Barlow , Rebecca Mason
Issue: 7570 / Categories: Features , Public , Human rights
printer mail-detail

All marriages are equal...

169856308_0

...but some are more equal than others, say Janet Barlow & Rebecca Mason

The controversial Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Act received royal assent last week. This Act is a ground-breaking piece of legislation which aims to put same sex couples on a level footing with that of heterosexual couples in relation to the institution of “marriage”. The Act will enable same sex couples to marry either in a civil ceremony or, if in agreement with the religious organisation, in a religious ceremony. The Civil Partnership Act 2004 (CPA 2004) had already given same sex couples the ability to make a legally recognised commitment to one another. However, this has never been regarded as a marriage due to Canon law. The Submission of the Clergy Act 1533, Canon B30, states that “the Church of England affirms, according to our Lord’s teaching that marriage is in its nature a union permanent and lifelong, for better for worse, till death them do part, of one man with one woman...” This was reaffirmed by

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
back-to-top-scroll