header-logo header-logo

30 October 2008
Issue: 7343 / Categories: Opinion , Employment
printer mail-detail

Arresting development

Chris Parr details how to win clients and influence people

Law firms seem to assume that all partners are, to some extent or another, “rain makers”. Each partner is required to devote a certain amount of time to winning new business. However, partners are the highest rated fee earners in the firm and so taking them off fee-earning is not wholly sensible.
Skill-set

If the partner is good at marketing and selling (two very different skills) then there are fewer issues. But what of the partner who is a great lawyer, with the rainmaking skills of a box? The firm might relieve those partners of their marketing duty. However, this means that those who do have the right skills must take on more work and more responsibility for the future of the firm.

This approach is storing up a further problem. If a firm relies on a few partners to bring in the bulk of the work, what happens if one or more of them stop working for the firm? There are many reasons why that will happen

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
Can a meticulously maintained spreadsheet turn a couple’s informal financial arrangements into legally enforceable obligations? 
back-to-top-scroll