header-logo header-logo

30 October 2008
Issue: 7343 / Categories: Opinion , Employment
printer mail-detail

Arresting development

Chris Parr details how to win clients and influence people

Law firms seem to assume that all partners are, to some extent or another, “rain makers”. Each partner is required to devote a certain amount of time to winning new business. However, partners are the highest rated fee earners in the firm and so taking them off fee-earning is not wholly sensible.
Skill-set

If the partner is good at marketing and selling (two very different skills) then there are fewer issues. But what of the partner who is a great lawyer, with the rainmaking skills of a box? The firm might relieve those partners of their marketing duty. However, this means that those who do have the right skills must take on more work and more responsibility for the future of the firm.

This approach is storing up a further problem. If a firm relies on a few partners to bring in the bulk of the work, what happens if one or more of them stop working for the firm? There are many reasons why that will happen

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
back-to-top-scroll