header-logo header-logo

Avoiding a pyrrhic victory

01 January 2009 / Kit Jarvis , James Lewis
Issue: 7350+7351 / Categories: Features , Commercial
printer mail-detail

James Lewis & Kit Jarvis discuss recent case law on enforcement

A judgment that cannot be enforced through to payment is really a pyrrhic victory that is, at best, valueless or, at worst, a source of additional loss through the legal fees expended to obtain it. Given current financial conditions, enforcement risk is of increased concern for those who may have to commence legal proceedings. In circumstances where the once mightyLehman Brothers was forced into administration within a very short period of time, it is also clear that those who have already embarked on legal proceedings against an opponent that appeared to be fi nancially solid at the time of commencement of proceedings would be well advised to focus on enforcement issues regularly throughout the litigation process.

The English courts have recently considered a variety of enforcement situations and, in the main, have tried to provide practical support for judgment creditors struggling to enforce the judgments they have obtained. Th is article looks at some of the most recent cases.


Receivers for equitable

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll