header-logo header-logo

01 January 2009 / Kit Jarvis , James Lewis
Issue: 7350+7351 / Categories: Features , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Avoiding a pyrrhic victory

James Lewis & Kit Jarvis discuss recent case law on enforcement

A judgment that cannot be enforced through to payment is really a pyrrhic victory that is, at best, valueless or, at worst, a source of additional loss through the legal fees expended to obtain it. Given current financial conditions, enforcement risk is of increased concern for those who may have to commence legal proceedings. In circumstances where the once mightyLehman Brothers was forced into administration within a very short period of time, it is also clear that those who have already embarked on legal proceedings against an opponent that appeared to be fi nancially solid at the time of commencement of proceedings would be well advised to focus on enforcement issues regularly throughout the litigation process.

The English courts have recently considered a variety of enforcement situations and, in the main, have tried to provide practical support for judgment creditors struggling to enforce the judgments they have obtained. Th is article looks at some of the most recent cases.


Receivers for equitable

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Regional law firm expands employment team with partner and senior associate hires

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Nottinghamtrusts, estates and tax team welcomes two senior associates

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
back-to-top-scroll