header-logo header-logo

11 December 2013 / Michael Salter , Chris Bryden
Issue: 7588 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Back & forth

web_bryden_salter

Chris Bryden & Michael Salter discuss some of the key developments of 2013 & share a few predictions...

With a nod towards the impending Winterval holiday period, this article rounds up some of the more interesting developments in the field of employment law throughout 2013, as well as forthcoming changes that employment practitioners can look forward to in 2014. There is no defining strand running through the matters highlighted other than they caught the eye of the authors.

 

New fees

The first matter in 2013, and probably that which cumulatively has affected employment practitioners the most is the introduction of fees for tribunal claims.

  • To lodge a claim in the employment tribunal a claimant must now either pay the fee or apply for a fee remission.
  • All claims made from 29 July 2013 fall within the fees regime.
  • In addition, a hearing fee is payable, and applications (such as for a review) also attract fees.
  • Cases are divided into type A and type B claims, with all but the most simple
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Winckworth Sherwood—David Fendt

Winckworth Sherwood—David Fendt

Restructuring and insolvency practice strengthened by partner hire

Gateley Legal—Billy Poulter & Shay Moore

Gateley Legal—Billy Poulter & Shay Moore

North West residential development team welcomes partner and associate

Burgess Mee—Victoria Sterritt

Burgess Mee—Victoria Sterritt

Family law boutique expands London team with legal director hire

NEWS
Some employment law controversies never disappear—they merely lie dormant
Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming legal practice, but its successful adoption depends as much on culture as technology
The fallout from Lord Mandelson’s appointment and dismissal as UK ambassador to Washington raises profound questions about constitutional governance, accountability and political appointments
Pastries may be in the firing line while kebabs escape scrutiny, but the reality is far more nuanced
The Supreme Court’s decision in Dillon highlights a central tension in modern public law: rights may be recognised without being fully realised
back-to-top-scroll