header-logo header-logo

Barristers vote again

20 June 2019
Issue: 7845 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Criminal
printer mail-detail
Criminal barristers have begun voting on whether to accept an ‘accelerated package of measures’, ahead of a potential 1 July walkout.

The confidential ballot ends on 26 June. Criminal Bar Association (CBA) chair Chris Henley QC said previous offers had not been good enough to put to the membership. Under the terms of the latest offer, which is being funded by the Treasury, the Crown Prosecution Service has agreed that, for all hearings/trials underway as at 1 September 2019, all fixed fees will be increased to the level of the Advocates’ Graduated Fees Scheme (AGFS), which sets payment levels for defence advocates. Refreshers will be paid from the second, rather than the third, day of trial. Continuation fees in long running trials will not be reduced from day 41.

On the AGFS, the Ministry of Justice has agreed to consider by the end of November the issues of unused material, fees for cracked trials and uplifts in paper-heavy cases.

Meanwhile, a wider review of fees will take place until summer 2020.

In his Monday Message on the CBA website, Henley said: ‘It has been presented as a global offer to the profession, which will not proceed if we reject it in favour of the proposed action.

‘Whether it will come back anytime soon is impossible to know…Action might achieve more at some future moment, but equally it might not, for all the obvious reasons.

‘If we don’t nail this down, before a general election, or a change of Attorney General and Lord Chancellor, who knows where we might end up, and how much longer a resolution will take.’

Issue: 7845 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Criminal
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Michael Zander KC, emeritus professor at LSE, revisits his long-forgotten Crown Court Study (1993), which surveyed 22,000 participants across 3,000 cases, in the first of a two-part series for NLJ
Getty Images v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) was a landmark test of how UK law applies to AI training—but does it leave key questions unanswered, asks Emma Kennaugh-Gallagher of Mewburn Ellis in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll