header-logo header-logo

31 May 2018
Issue: 7795 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail

BC reports on a tale of two Bars

nlj_7795_news

Survey paints mixed picture of a barrister’s working life

A barrister’s life is a stressful one, according to a Bar Council report.

More than 4,000 barristers responded to a survey for the report, published last week, Barristers’ Working Lives 2017: Barristers’ attitudes towards their working lives. It reveals a picture of barristers struggling with a heavy workload, stress and a poor work-life balance. Barristers routinely work the equivalent of one or two days per week unpaid, while funding cuts are causing one in three criminal barristers to rethink their choice of career.

However, the report also tells a tale of two Bars—the emotionally drained and underpaid Criminal Bar, 62% of whom work at least one day a week unpaid; and the more positive Commercial and Chancery Bar.

Moreover, despite all the stress, 89% of barristers find their work interesting and 61% of barristers across all practice areas agreed that they feel enthusiastic about their work most days.

In terms of hours, 27% of criminal barristers and 33% of family barristers work more than 60 hours a week, compared to 16% in commercial and chancery, 17% in civil and an average of 22% across all practice areas, which is up from 13% in 2013.

Across the Bar, only 26% said they were not under too much work pressure (compared to 33% in 2013). 58% of criminal barristers and 66% of family barristers felt they were under too much work pressure.

Andrew Walker QC, Chair of the Bar, said: ‘There is a notable difference between those practising in crime (and, to a degree, in family work) and the rest of the Bar. 

‘It should also be recognised that the survey was conducted in the summer of 2017, since when legal aid fees have been eroded further by inflation. The fact that many saw their workload, stress and work-life balance deteriorate yet further between 2013 and 2017 is a worrying trend. 

‘It shows that we must all maintain our efforts across the Bar to support those who are finding practice ever more difficult to sustain, both financially and in terms of maintaining and enjoying a healthy and fulfilling life both at work and at home.’

Issue: 7795 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
Litigators digesting Mazur are being urged to tighten oversight and compliance. In his latest 'Insider' column for NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School provides a cut out and keep guide to the ruling’s core test: whether an unauthorised individual is ‘in truth acting on behalf of the authorised individual’
Conflicting county court rulings have left landlords uncertain over whether they can force entry after tenants refuse access. In this week's NLJ, Edward Blakeney and Ashpen Rajah of Falcon Chambers outline a split: some judges permit it under CPR 70.2A, others insist only Parliament can authorise such powers
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
back-to-top-scroll