header-logo header-logo

20 June 2019
Issue: 7845 / Categories: Legal News , Immigration & asylum , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Brook House inquiry

A proposed Home Office investigation into claims of systemic abuse at Brook House Immigration Removal Centre is insufficient, the High Court has held.

Mrs Justice May held that any inquiry must be able to compel the 21 staff from the security firm G4S to give evidence. She said ‘the egregious nature of the breaches’ meant any inquiry into the claims should have these powers. She also ruled that the detainees must be entitled to publicly-funded lawyers since, for justice to be done in ‘any meaningful way’, the detainees ‘must be able to meet their [alleged] abusers on equal terms’. Further, the inquiry must be held in public, she said.

The case was brought by two former detainees, MA and BB, who featured in an undercover BBC Panorama programme on the centre in 2017. The programme revealed staff mocking and assaulting detainees.

Duncan Lewis solicitor Lewis Kett, who represented MA, said the judgment ‘ensures that those officers can be held to account’. He said a full statutory inquiry is now necessary.

Martha Spurrier, Liberty director, said: ‘To even begin to put an end to this inhumanity the government must implement a 28 -time limit on detention.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

JMW—Belinda Brooke

JMW—Belinda Brooke

Employment and people solutions offering boosted by partner hire

NEWS

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law
back-to-top-scroll