header-logo header-logo

Brook House inquiry

20 June 2019
Issue: 7845 / Categories: Legal News , Immigration & asylum , Human rights
printer mail-detail
A proposed Home Office investigation into claims of systemic abuse at Brook House Immigration Removal Centre is insufficient, the High Court has held.

Mrs Justice May held that any inquiry must be able to compel the 21 staff from the security firm G4S to give evidence. She said ‘the egregious nature of the breaches’ meant any inquiry into the claims should have these powers. She also ruled that the detainees must be entitled to publicly-funded lawyers since, for justice to be done in ‘any meaningful way’, the detainees ‘must be able to meet their [alleged] abusers on equal terms’. Further, the inquiry must be held in public, she said.

The case was brought by two former detainees, MA and BB, who featured in an undercover BBC Panorama programme on the centre in 2017. The programme revealed staff mocking and assaulting detainees.

Duncan Lewis solicitor Lewis Kett, who represented MA, said the judgment ‘ensures that those officers can be held to account’. He said a full statutory inquiry is now necessary.

Martha Spurrier, Liberty director, said: ‘To even begin to put an end to this inhumanity the government must implement a 28 -time limit on detention.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Appointment of former Solicitor General bolsters corporate investigations and white collar practice

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Firm strengthens international strategy with hire of global relations consultant

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Partner and associate join employment practice

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll