header-logo header-logo

13 December 2023
Issue: 8053 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail

Bullying, harassment & discrimination at the Bar

Inappropriate or unacceptable behaviour, bullying, harassment and discrimination at the Bar is a ‘systemic issue’, the Bar Council has said, after research uncovered shocking levels of abuse at work

The poor behaviour ranged across the profession and involved judges, barristers, chambers’ staff, solicitors and court staff. Incidents ranged from pejorative or demeaning language to intimidating or bullying behaviour, unwanted attention, unwanted physical contact, sexual harassment and serious abuse, inappropriate comments, online abuse, and sexist, racist and ableist behaviours.

Bar Council research published last week, ‘Bullying, harassment and discrimination at the Bar 2023’, found 44% of respondents have experienced or observed such behaviour while working either in person or online (up from 38% in 2021 and 31% in 2017).

Of the 1,233 barristers who reported experiencing or observing bullying and/or harassment, the majority (53%) reported a member of the judiciary as the person responsible, followed by a more senior barrister (31%) or a barrister at the same level (14%).

Women, people of colour, younger and more junior members of the Bar were most affected by bullying, harassment and discrimination. Barristers with caring responsibilities or a disability also reported being disproportionately affected.

The perpetrators of bad behaviour were generally in a position of power or influence, and included judges, more senior barristers, senior clerks and practice managers. Fear of repercussions was the primary reason given for not reporting incidents. In particular, some people were told that if they complained they would never work at the Bar again.

The data was drawn from the biennial survey, Barristers’ working lives, as well as from reports to Talk to Spot and calls to the Bar’s helplines.

Nick Vineall KC, Chair of the Bar Council, said the Bar Council was committed to addressing the problems and has commissioned a review, to be established by spring 2024 and report back by spring 2025, to identify strategies to curb the abuse.

Sam Townend KC, Chair-Elect of the Bar Council, said: ‘The Bar Council identifies bullying, harassment and discrimination as a systemic issue and we hope the judiciary, clerks, chambers professionals and the Inns will work together with us to facilitate meaningful change.’

Issue: 8053 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Chief information officer appointment strengthens technology leadership

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Firm strengthens Wilmslow team with two solicitor appointments

DWF—Ian Plumley

DWF—Ian Plumley

Londoninsurance and reinsurance practice announces partner appointment

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll