header-logo header-logo

05 July 2007 / Jeremy Nixon
Issue: 7280 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Butts out

How will the new non-smoking legislation affect the workplace? Jeremy Nixon investigates

With effect from 1 July 2007, England came into line with Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland when smoking in all enclosed public places was banned.

In common with much of the employment law legislation we have seen over recent years, the new provisions in relation to smoking place what was best practice on a statutory footing, since for many years now smoking has been prohibited in most workplaces. A further similarity between the smoking legislation and other recent changes to employment law—particularly the statutory grievance and dismissal procedures—is the fact that the legislation is spread across a number of different statutory provisions, which will certainly keep employment lawyers and human resources (HR) managers on their toes when interpreting them.

THE STATUTORY FRAMEWORK

The new law is found in:
- The Health Act 2006.
- The Smoke-free (Premises and Enforcement) Regulations 2006 (SI 2006/3368).
- The Smoke-free (Exemptions and Vehicles) Regulations 2007 (SI 2007/765).
- The Smoke-free (Penalties and Discounted Amounts) Regulations 2007 (SI 2007/764).
- The Smoke-free (Vehicle Operators

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Regional law firm expands employment team with partner and senior associate hires

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Nottinghamtrusts, estates and tax team welcomes two senior associates

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
back-to-top-scroll