header-logo header-logo

A capital statement

15 October 2009 / Jane Mayfield
Issue: 7389 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

Jane Mayfield reports on new filing arrangements for statements of capital

Under the Companies Act 2006 (CA 2006), from 1 October 2009 a statement of capital (either as a stand alone form, eg on a reduction of capital, or incorporated into a larger form such as the annual return) must be filed with the Registrar of Companies at certain times during a company’s life including:
as part of the application to incorporate (CA 2006, s 10);
as part of any annual return made up to any date on or after 1 October 2009 (CA 2006, s 856 (1) and (2));
or
following an allotment of shares or other capital changes, eg the consolidation or sub-division of shares, the re-conversion of stock into shares, the redemption of redeemable shares or a reduction of share capital etc.

A company must also provide a current statement of capital to a member if such member requests one.

Contents of a statement of capital

The statement of capital must state:
the total number of shares of the company;
the aggregate nominal

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

FOIL—Bridget Tatham

FOIL—Bridget Tatham

Forum of Insurance Lawyers elects president for 2026

Gibson Dunn—Robbie Sinclair

Gibson Dunn—Robbie Sinclair

Partner joinslabour and employment practice in London

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

NEWS
Cryptocurrency is reshaping financial remedy cases, warns Robert Webster of Maguire Family Law in NLJ this week. Digital assets—concealable, volatile and hard to trace—are fuelling suspicions of hidden wealth, yet Form E still lacks a section for crypto-disclosure
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold surveys a flurry of procedural reforms in his latest 'Civil way' column
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
back-to-top-scroll