header-logo header-logo

15 October 2009 / Jane Mayfield
Issue: 7389 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

A capital statement

Jane Mayfield reports on new filing arrangements for statements of capital

Under the Companies Act 2006 (CA 2006), from 1 October 2009 a statement of capital (either as a stand alone form, eg on a reduction of capital, or incorporated into a larger form such as the annual return) must be filed with the Registrar of Companies at certain times during a company’s life including:
as part of the application to incorporate (CA 2006, s 10);
as part of any annual return made up to any date on or after 1 October 2009 (CA 2006, s 856 (1) and (2));
or
following an allotment of shares or other capital changes, eg the consolidation or sub-division of shares, the re-conversion of stock into shares, the redemption of redeemable shares or a reduction of share capital etc.

A company must also provide a current statement of capital to a member if such member requests one.

Contents of a statement of capital

The statement of capital must state:
the total number of shares of the company;
the aggregate

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll