header-logo header-logo

15 October 2009 / Jane Mayfield
Issue: 7389 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

A capital statement

Jane Mayfield reports on new filing arrangements for statements of capital

Under the Companies Act 2006 (CA 2006), from 1 October 2009 a statement of capital (either as a stand alone form, eg on a reduction of capital, or incorporated into a larger form such as the annual return) must be filed with the Registrar of Companies at certain times during a company’s life including:
as part of the application to incorporate (CA 2006, s 10);
as part of any annual return made up to any date on or after 1 October 2009 (CA 2006, s 856 (1) and (2));
or
following an allotment of shares or other capital changes, eg the consolidation or sub-division of shares, the re-conversion of stock into shares, the redemption of redeemable shares or a reduction of share capital etc.

A company must also provide a current statement of capital to a member if such member requests one.

Contents of a statement of capital

The statement of capital must state:
the total number of shares of the company;
the aggregate

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Regional law firm expands employment team with partner and senior associate hires

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Nottinghamtrusts, estates and tax team welcomes two senior associates

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
back-to-top-scroll