header-logo header-logo

Car dealerships kept quiet about commissions

30 October 2024
Issue: 8092 / Categories: Legal News , Consumer , Commercial , Financial services litigation
printer mail-detail

Buyers of cars have a right to know about, and must give consent to, any commission arrangements between their finance lender and car dealer, the Court of Appeal has held

Ruling in three conjoined cases, Johnson v Firstrand Bank (London branch) t/a Motonovo Finance [2024] EWCA Civ 1282, the court found car dealers have a fiduciary duty when arranging finance, and must be upfront about any commission. It held dealers did not satisfy this duty by hiding information about commissions in small print in terms and conditions appended to the finance agreement. Consequently, the lender was liable for the repayment of the commission in all three cases.

Handing down their judgment last week, Lady Justice Andrews and Lords Justice Birss and Edis said: ‘The dealer is acting as a seller of the cars, and also as a credit broker.

‘A credit broker offers services to help people to find credit by considering the market (or a particular section of the market) and introducing them to a potential lender who can offer them a deal which is suitable for their requirements. There is no hint in the evidence in any of these cases that the consumers concerned were aware of this.’

Kavon Hussain, principal of Consumer Rights Solicitors, which acted for two of the appellants, said: ‘This Court of Appeal judgment is going to affect every lender in the market, including Lloyds Black Horse, VW Finance, BMW, Stellantis, Mercedes, and Barclays Clydesdale.

‘We already have a substantial number of clients with claims waiting to go. This decision is a huge step towards those clients being repaid these hidden commissions.’ The firm believes the figure owed to consumers could be as high as £42bn. 

In 2021, the Financial Conduct Authority banned lenders from allowing car dealers to set the rates charged to customers on credit agreements. 

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Winckworth Sherwood—Tim Foley

Winckworth Sherwood—Tim Foley

Property litigation practice strengthened by partner hire

Kingsley Napley—Romilly Holland

Kingsley Napley—Romilly Holland

International arbitration team specialist joins the team

Red Lion Chambers—Maurice MacSweeney

Red Lion Chambers—Maurice MacSweeney

Set creates new client and business development role amid growth

NEWS
The rank of King’s Counsel (KC) has been awarded to 96 barristers, and no solicitors, in the latest silk round
Can a chief constable be held responsible for disobedient officers? Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth, professor of public law at De Montfort University, examines a Court of Appeal ruling that answers firmly: yes
Neurotechnology is poised to transform contract law—and unsettle it. Writing in NLJ this week, Harry Lambert, barrister at Outer Temple Chambers and founder of the Centre for Neurotechnology & Law, and Dr Michelle Sharpe, barrister at the Victorian Bar, explore how brain–computer interfaces could both prove and undermine consent
Comparators remain the fault line of discrimination law. In this week's NLJ, Anjali Malik, partner at Bellevue Law, and Mukhtiar Singh, barrister at Doughty Street Chambers, review a bumper year of appellate guidance clarifying how tribunals should approach ‘actual’ and ‘evidential’ comparators. A new six-stage framework stresses a simple starting point: identify the treatment first
In cross-border divorces, domicile can decide everything. In NLJ this week, Jennifer Headon, legal director and head of international family, Isobel Inkley, solicitor, and Fiona Collins, trainee solicitor, all at Birketts LLP, unpack a Court of Appeal ruling that re-centres nuance in jurisdiction disputes. The court held that once a domicile of choice is established, the burden lies on the party asserting its loss
back-to-top-scroll