header-logo header-logo

30 October 2024
Issue: 8092 / Categories: Legal News , Consumer , Commercial , Financial services litigation
printer mail-detail

Car dealerships kept quiet about commissions

Buyers of cars have a right to know about, and must give consent to, any commission arrangements between their finance lender and car dealer, the Court of Appeal has held

Ruling in three conjoined cases, Johnson v Firstrand Bank (London branch) t/a Motonovo Finance [2024] EWCA Civ 1282, the court found car dealers have a fiduciary duty when arranging finance, and must be upfront about any commission. It held dealers did not satisfy this duty by hiding information about commissions in small print in terms and conditions appended to the finance agreement. Consequently, the lender was liable for the repayment of the commission in all three cases.

Handing down their judgment last week, Lady Justice Andrews and Lords Justice Birss and Edis said: ‘The dealer is acting as a seller of the cars, and also as a credit broker.

‘A credit broker offers services to help people to find credit by considering the market (or a particular section of the market) and introducing them to a potential lender who can offer them a deal which is suitable for their requirements. There is no hint in the evidence in any of these cases that the consumers concerned were aware of this.’

Kavon Hussain, principal of Consumer Rights Solicitors, which acted for two of the appellants, said: ‘This Court of Appeal judgment is going to affect every lender in the market, including Lloyds Black Horse, VW Finance, BMW, Stellantis, Mercedes, and Barclays Clydesdale.

‘We already have a substantial number of clients with claims waiting to go. This decision is a huge step towards those clients being repaid these hidden commissions.’ The firm believes the figure owed to consumers could be as high as £42bn. 

In 2021, the Financial Conduct Authority banned lenders from allowing car dealers to set the rates charged to customers on credit agreements. 

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

Senior appointments in insurance services and commercial services announced

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Aviation disputes practice strengthened by London partner hire

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Residential property lawyer promoted to partnership

NEWS
he abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC
Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll