header-logo header-logo

Careering ahead

23 October 2015 / Alex Leslie
Issue: 7673 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail
nlj_7673_leslie

Alex Leslie discusses the irresistible rise of the implied term in the contract of employment

The most powerful term implied into the contract of employment may be the term obliging an employer not to act in a way that undermines or seriously damages the relationship of mutual trust and confidence with the employee, qualified as it is by the proviso not to do so without reasonable and proper cause. The application of implied terms in particular circumstances is interesting.

Chhabra v West London Mental Health NHS Trust

In Chhabra v West London Mental Health NHS Trust [2013] UKSC 80, [2013] All ER (D) 164 (Dec) the court was concerned with the disciplinary investigation of an NHS trust concerning the employee’s conduct, which was largely about breaches of confidentiality by the employee. Early on in the process, the employer gave an undertaking that one of its HR staff would not be further involved in the investigation. Dr Chhabra was interviewed by the appointed trust investigator and a report was produced. The trust procedure then required another person

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll