header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
20 May 2020 / Tori Adams , Killian Moran
Issue: 7887 / Categories: Features , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Centre of detention

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
21123
Tori Adams & Killian Moran discuss claims of unlawful detention and the impact of COVID-19 lockdown measures
  • Unlawful detention claims: nothing new.
  • Unlawful detention generally: principles of lawfulness.
  • Unlawful detention and COVID-19: the current climate.
  • Important principles of the tort of false imprisonment: human rights legislation.

Unlawful detention claims are nothing new within the jurisdiction of England and Wales, especially in an immigration context, and the law in relation to such claims is well-established and clear. It has long been commonplace that these cases settle before going to court, with the Home Office spending thousands to rectify administrative and legal errors which have led to the continued unlawful detention of immigrants. However, with recent restrictions brought about by COVID-19 we believe that the Home Office, and the courts, should consider what more can be done to reduce the number of people detained under immigration powers. Failing to do so could result in significant periods for which detention is unlawful.

Unlawful detention generally

Immigration practitioners and civil litigators working

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

Fieldfisher partner appointed president as LSLA marks milestone year

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Firm promotes two lawyers to partnership across employment and family

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Firm promotes five lawyers to partnership across key growth areas

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Divorce ‘nuclear weapon’ freezes assets but entangles outsiders
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
NLJ this week: What counts as ‘rent’? Court says labour alone won’t do
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Your magistrates’ court needs you!
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
NLJ this week: Freed but failed—justice system leaves the innocent empty-handed
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
NLJ this week: Clarity on whistleblowing, settlements and tribunal limits
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll