header-logo header-logo

As clear as mud

The waters are still muddied over Beecroft “sack on the spot” proposals, notes Charles Pigott

The government’s plans for no-fault dismissal are still unclear, despite the publication of the full Beecroft report last month, and the debate on the second reading of the Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Bill on 11 June.

The story so far

When selected pages of Adrian Beecroft’s review of employment law were leaked last year, they exposed one of his most controversial ideas. This was a “compensated no-fault dismissal” regime, which would allow employers to fire more or less at will, provided a minimum level of compensation was provided. Little additional detail was given, and the proposals were reportedly dismissed at the time by Vince Cable as “bonkers”.

However, these ideas re-surfaced, in a modified form, in a call for evidence published by the Department for Business Innovation and Skills (BIS) in March 2012. Entitled Dealing with dismissal and “compensated no-fault dismissal” for micro businesses, it transformed the original Beecroft idea into a specific exemption for

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Steven James

Pillsbury—Steven James

Firm boosts London IP capability with high-profile technology sector hire

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Private client specialist joins as partner in Taunton office

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

Finance and restructuring offering strengthened by partner hire in London

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll