header-logo header-logo

Clinical cop-out in new Bill?

30 June 2011
Issue: 7472 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Committee attacks bid to end retrieval of clinical negligence success fees

The House of Commons Health Committee has criticised Ministry of Justice proposals to end the recoverability of success fees in clinical negligence cases.

Under the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Bill, which seeks to implement the majority of Lord Justice Jackson’s review of civil litigation, after-the-event legal expenses insurance would continue to be recoverable in clinical negligence cases, due to the high cost of initial disbursements. However, success fees would not.

In a report this week, the committee, chaired by former health secretary Stephen Dorrell MP, warned this could “undermine access to justice” and erode compensation for “the most seriously injured or disabled claimants”.

The committee noted that Jackson LJ stated in his review that it was “vital” for legal aid to remain available in clinical negligence cases. The Bill removes this, saving about £17m.

The committee highlighted the finding of Action against Medical Accidents that at least an equivalent amount would be saved for the NHS if legal aid were retained, rather than cases being brought on a “no win, no fee” basis.

It took aim at the 300 claims management companies, also known as “claims farmers”, in the UK, which it said had caused the number of claims against the NHS to rise by 10% in each of the last two years. It said they sold claims to the highest bidding solicitor not the most appropriate, encouraged people to go straight to litigation rather than seek alternative means of redress, and often tempted clients into signing by offering immediate cash payments.

However, the committee welcomed proposals to develop a rapid resolution process for low-value NHS claims, which would speed up admissions of liability and reduce costs for the NHS. It called on the government to release more details of this scheme.

Peter Lodder QC, chairman of the Bar, who has written to MPs expressing concern about the Bill, said: “A cut-price, DIY justice system, which will actually end up costing more money, rather than saving it, is in no one’s interests.”

Last week, legal expenses insurer, Elite Insurance announced it was leaving the Association of British Insurers in protest at the ABI’s support for the Jackson reforms, particularly the end of recoverability of premiums.

Issue: 7472 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

FOIL—Bridget Tatham

FOIL—Bridget Tatham

Forum of Insurance Lawyers elects president for 2026

Gibson Dunn—Robbie Sinclair

Gibson Dunn—Robbie Sinclair

Partner joinslabour and employment practice in London

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

NEWS
Cryptocurrency is reshaping financial remedy cases, warns Robert Webster of Maguire Family Law in NLJ this week. Digital assets—concealable, volatile and hard to trace—are fuelling suspicions of hidden wealth, yet Form E still lacks a section for crypto-disclosure
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold surveys a flurry of procedural reforms in his latest 'Civil way' column
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
back-to-top-scroll