header-logo header-logo

Compensation excludes dividends

29 January 2015
Issue: 7638 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Company directors who save on tax by accepting a modest salary and remuneration by dividend could be in for a nasty shock if they ever come to claim compensation.

A company director had his compensation capped to £9,254 annual earnings with dividend income entirely excluded from consideration, in a landmark decision at Manchester Employment Tribunal. If the income from the dividend had been included, he would have been awarded £74,000 in compensation.

In Sheridan v GTECH Solutions Ltd, the tribunal refused to acknowledge the dividend of the director/shareholder. Instead, it calculated a cap of one year’s earning, in line with s 124(1ZA) of the Employment Rights Act 1996, by reference only to the claimants PAYE salary of £756 per month.

Ian Procter, solicitor advocate and partner at Green Solicitors, who represented the employer respondent, says: “This is a landmark decision and although coming at first instance will be very persuasive to other tribunals due to its careful consideration of the law and extensive and detailed judgment.

“It is thought to be the first time this issue has been raised before an employment tribunal following the introduction of the cap recently and the tribunal accepted my submission, that ‘for the purpose of calculating the statutory cap earnings did not include dividends but only PAYE earnings, as only they were contractually due under the contract of employment. Further a dividend arises as a result of an individual’s status as shareholder and is not payable by the company as of right or as a result of employment’.”

Issue: 7638 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kingsley Napley—Claire Green

Kingsley Napley—Claire Green

Firm announces appointment of chief legal officer

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Firm bolsters Manchester insurance practice with double partner appointment

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

NEWS
The landmark Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd—along with Rukhadze v Recovery Partners—redefine fiduciary duties in commercial fraud. Writing in NLJ this week, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley analyses the implications of the rulings
Barristers Ben Keith of 5 St Andrew’s Hill and Rhys Davies of Temple Garden Chambers use the arrest of Simon Leviev—the so-called Tinder Swindler—to explore the realities of Interpol red notices, in this week's NLJ
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] has upended assumptions about who may conduct litigation, warn Kevin Latham and Fraser Barnstaple of Kings Chambers in this week's NLJ. But is it as catastrophic as first feared?
Lord Sales has been appointed to become the Deputy President of the Supreme Court after Lord Hodge retires at the end of the year
Limited liability partnerships (LLPs) are reportedly in the firing line in Chancellor Rachel Reeves upcoming Autumn budget
back-to-top-scroll