header-logo header-logo

11 March 2010 / Kerry Underwood
Issue: 7408 / Categories: Features , Damages , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Contingency matters

Kerry Underwood welcomes the first steps to full contingency fees

Contingency fee agreements are prohibited in any issued case in the High Court or County Court in England and Wales, but this may be about to change, as a result of the Jackson Report.

“Contingency fee” is used to describe an agreement by which the client’s lawyer is only paid if the claim is successful and is then paid out of damages received, usually as a percentage of those damages, the percentage being fixed in advance of the claim being made. Pure conditional fee agreements are a form of contingency fee in that the client’s obligation to pay is contingent upon winning but that extra fee is a percentage uplift on costs and is unrelated to damages.

Success fees conditional

No win, lower fee conditional fee agreements, increasingly used in commercial cases, are a strange hybrid where, as the name suggests, the solicitor gets a higher hourly rate for winning, but still gets paid in the event of defeat, albeit a lower fee.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

JMW—Belinda Brooke

JMW—Belinda Brooke

Employment and people solutions offering boosted by partner hire

NEWS
A seemingly dry procedural update may prove potent. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold explains that new CPR 31.12A—part of the 193rd update—fills a ‘lacuna’ exposed in McLaren Indy v Alpa Racing
The long-running Mazur saga edged towards its finale as the Court of Appeal heard arguments on whether non-solicitors can ‘conduct litigation’. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School reports from a packed courtroom where 16 wigs watched Nick Bacon KC argue that Mr Justice Sheldon had failed to distinguish between ‘tasks and responsibilities’

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
back-to-top-scroll