header-logo header-logo

01 August 2019 / Veronica Cowan
Issue: 7851 / Categories: Features , Profession , Property , Technology
printer mail-detail

Conveyancing & time-saving technology

Veronica Cowan explains why it’s time for conveyancing firms to embrace digitalisation & adopt modern work practices

  • The need to adapt and survive: to meet the demands of buyers and sellers of property and address the challenge of increasing consolidation within the sector.

The initial thrill of buying a house can fade with snail-paced conveyancing, and not knowing what is happening. Recent research by InfoTrack found communication issues affect many consumer property transactions, with huge demand for conveyancers to introduce technology to improve digital communication, to access real-time information about their transactions. Clients of Simply Conveyancing Property Lawyers, who have or can download the Alexa app, can ask questions at any time about their conveyancing transaction, through its integration into its internal system eConvey.

Other initiatives are on track: the most recent report from the Solicitors’ Regulation Authority on technology and legal services found technological innovations reshaping the sector, with the use of artificial intelligence becoming increasingly common. Andy Sommerville, director at Search Acumen, the property data insight and technology

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll