header-logo header-logo

31 July 2009 / Chris Brierly , Patrick Boylan , Will Francis
Issue: 7380 / Categories: Opinion , Costs
printer mail-detail

Counting the Total cost

Patrick Boylan, Will Francis & Chris Brierly examine costs issues arising from the Buncefield litigation

The Buncefield litigation was one of the largest cases in the Commercial Court in 2008. At its height, it involved over a hundred parties. The claimant group was diverse, spanning individual home owners whose property had suffered damage, to the oil majors BP and Shell.  

While the legal issues in the case were complex, the facts were straightforward. On 11 December 2005, petrol from an underground pipeline was being received into an overground storage tank.

The operator on duty negligently failed to switch the flow to a further empty tank once the original one had become full.

This resulted in 300 tonnes of fuel overflowing from the tank, which subsequently formed a vapour cloud, which then ignited and generated the biggest explosion ever to have taken place in peacetime Europe.

Denial

Over the following two and a half years the defendant (Total) denied negligence,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll