header-logo header-logo

Counting the Total cost

31 July 2009 / Chris Brierly , Patrick Boylan , Will Francis
Issue: 7380 / Categories: Opinion , Costs
printer mail-detail

Patrick Boylan, Will Francis & Chris Brierly examine costs issues arising from the Buncefield litigation

The Buncefield litigation was one of the largest cases in the Commercial Court in 2008. At its height, it involved over a hundred parties. The claimant group was diverse, spanning individual home owners whose property had suffered damage, to the oil majors BP and Shell.  

While the legal issues in the case were complex, the facts were straightforward. On 11 December 2005, petrol from an underground pipeline was being received into an overground storage tank.

The operator on duty negligently failed to switch the flow to a further empty tank once the original one had become full.

This resulted in 300 tonnes of fuel overflowing from the tank, which subsequently formed a vapour cloud, which then ignited and generated the biggest explosion ever to have taken place in peacetime Europe.

Denial

Over the following two and a half years the defendant (Total) denied negligence,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll