header-logo header-logo

Court rebukes family judges

30 March 2007
Issue: 7266 / Categories: Legal News , Child law , Family
printer mail-detail

Appeal court judges have delivered a stinging rebuke of a series of administrative and judicial errors in the child custody case Hammerton v Hammerton, where the father was sent to prison for three months.

The trial judge, Mr Justice Collins, was wrong to conduct joint proceedings for contact and committal, and this led to “inescapable errors in procedure” that deprived Mr Hammerton of the protection to which he was entitled, Lord Justice Moses said in his judgment.

Mr Hammerton, who was unrepresented, had applied for contact with two of his five children, while Mrs Hammerton had applied for her ex-husband’s committal to prison for breach of previous court orders. Collins J heard both applications together.

Moses LJ said the court below breached Mr Hammerton’s right to a fair trial and that the court should have inquired into the reasons why the father was unrepresented, and granted an adjournment while this could be resolved.
“The important rights en-shrined in Art 6 [of the European Convention on Human Rights] must not be sacrificed in the interests of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Cryptocurrency is reshaping financial remedy cases, warns Robert Webster of Maguire Family Law in NLJ this week. Digital assets—concealable, volatile and hard to trace—are fuelling suspicions of hidden wealth, yet Form E still lacks a section for crypto-disclosure
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold surveys a flurry of procedural reforms in his latest 'Civil way' column
back-to-top-scroll