header-logo header-logo

Court rebukes family judges

30 March 2007
Issue: 7266 / Categories: Legal News , Child law , Family
printer mail-detail

Appeal court judges have delivered a stinging rebuke of a series of administrative and judicial errors in the child custody case Hammerton v Hammerton, where the father was sent to prison for three months.

The trial judge, Mr Justice Collins, was wrong to conduct joint proceedings for contact and committal, and this led to “inescapable errors in procedure” that deprived Mr Hammerton of the protection to which he was entitled, Lord Justice Moses said in his judgment.

Mr Hammerton, who was unrepresented, had applied for contact with two of his five children, while Mrs Hammerton had applied for her ex-husband’s committal to prison for breach of previous court orders. Collins J heard both applications together.

Moses LJ said the court below breached Mr Hammerton’s right to a fair trial and that the court should have inquired into the reasons why the father was unrepresented, and granted an adjournment while this could be resolved.
“The important rights en-shrined in Art 6 [of the European Convention on Human Rights] must not be sacrificed in the interests of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll